2012
DOI: 10.1111/dgd.12002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartilage on the move: Cartilage lineage tracing during tadpole metamorphosis

Abstract: The reorganization of cranial cartilages during tadpole metamorphosis is a set of complex processes. The fates of larval cartilage-forming cells (chondrocytes) and sources of adult chondrocytes are largely unknown. Individual larval cranial cartilages may either degenerate or remodel, while many adult cartilages appear to form de novo during metamorphosis. Determining the extent to which adult chondrocytes/cartilages are derived from larval chondrocytes during metamorphosis requires new techniques in chondrocy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study in contrast focuses on the individual cartilages of a skull region throughout life, and separates their shape trajectories into phases of pre-and post-metamorphic growth and metamorphosis. Quantifying shape trajectories in this manner provides a framework for investigating how cartilage growth and metamorphic remodeling are controlled at the level of individual cell behaviors (Rose, 2009;Slater et al 2009;Kerney et al 2012) and affected by mutations and exogenously applied hormones, teratogens and environmental toxins (Huang et al 1999;Schreiber et al 2001;Das et al 2002;Du Preez et al 2008;Kerney et al 2012;Vandenberg et al 2012). Further, comparing multiple cartilages with similar embryonic origins and different functions throughout life reveals how skeletal shape trajectories can be modified by selection on a complex life history Alberch, 1987Alberch, , 1989 and at the same time constrained by the cellular and histological properties of cartilage tissue (Rose, 2009).…”
Section: The Evolutionary Significance Of the Lj And Ch Shape Trajectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study in contrast focuses on the individual cartilages of a skull region throughout life, and separates their shape trajectories into phases of pre-and post-metamorphic growth and metamorphosis. Quantifying shape trajectories in this manner provides a framework for investigating how cartilage growth and metamorphic remodeling are controlled at the level of individual cell behaviors (Rose, 2009;Slater et al 2009;Kerney et al 2012) and affected by mutations and exogenously applied hormones, teratogens and environmental toxins (Huang et al 1999;Schreiber et al 2001;Das et al 2002;Du Preez et al 2008;Kerney et al 2012;Vandenberg et al 2012). Further, comparing multiple cartilages with similar embryonic origins and different functions throughout life reveals how skeletal shape trajectories can be modified by selection on a complex life history Alberch, 1987Alberch, , 1989 and at the same time constrained by the cellular and histological properties of cartilage tissue (Rose, 2009).…”
Section: The Evolutionary Significance Of the Lj And Ch Shape Trajectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a tail injection assay involving a standard form of GFP whose protein lasts for weeks in vivo (Kerney et al, 2012) to determine the effect of THT or CTHBP overexpression on metamorphic change, i.e., TH-dependent tail muscle cell disappearance. The loss of GFP signal from a muscle cell within 24 hrs is considered strong evidence of cell death Nakajima et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both pathways require that larval cartilages have relatively little matrix and undergo cell division to produce smaller cells that can either be rearranged to reshape the larval cartilage or undergo morphogenesis to form a new cartilage within the resorbing larval cartilage. In contrast to Kerney et al, (2012b), histological description and careful morphometric analyses of the Meckels cartilage and ceratohyal in Xenopus (Rose, 2009(Rose, , 2015 suggest that these cartilages exemplify these two pathways.…”
Section: How Do Pharyngeal Arch Cartilages Grow and Change Shape?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Other new elements or cartilage additions that appear to arise in this way include the frog tympanic ring and columella, the cells for which appear to derive from the perichondrium of a resorbing part of the palatoquadrate (Barry, 1956, van der Westhuizen, 1961; the posterior hook and lateral plate-like additions to salamander ceratohyals; the posterior radial cartilages of salamanders and the two or three paired processes of the hyoglossal skeleton in frogs. Efforts to label the larval portions of adult cartilages in Xenopus suggest that both ends of the adult Meckels cartilage are also added on in this manner (Kerney et al, 2012b). Whether progenitor cells are always recruited from the perichondria of resorbing cartilages or can also derive from uncondensed populations of former neural crest cells is unclear.…”
Section: How Do Pharyngeal Arch Cartilages Grow and Change Shape?mentioning
confidence: 99%