2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0523-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartilage lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic effectiveness of multidetector spiral CT arthrography and comparison with arthroscopy

Abstract: This study assessed the diagnostic effectiveness of multidetector spiral CT arthrography (MDCTa) in detecting hyaline cartilage abnormalities of the shoulder joint, with correlation to arthroscopy. Shoulder MDCTa images prospectively obtained in 22 consecutive patients (mean age, 50 years; age range, 23-74 years; 12 female, 10 male) were evaluated for glenohumeral cartilage lesions. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently analysed the cartilage surfaces of the humeral head and of the glenoid fossa in ni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lecouvet et al evaluated the Data are sensitivity and specificity and accuracy (%) followed by 95 % confidence intervals in brackets. Pairwise comparisons between the diagnostic performance of techniques (CTA vs. MRA) and readers (reader 1 vs. reader 2) showed statistically significant differences for all comparisons: diagnostic performance of CTA was statistically significantly higher than MRA for reader 1 and 2 for the evaluation of all, glenoidal or humeral head cartilage lesions for both readers (all p≤0.04) [28]. One study by Acid et al, focusing on instability lesions, compared the diagnostic performance of CTA and MRA in assessing glenoid cartilage lesions in the same series of 40 patients [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Lecouvet et al evaluated the Data are sensitivity and specificity and accuracy (%) followed by 95 % confidence intervals in brackets. Pairwise comparisons between the diagnostic performance of techniques (CTA vs. MRA) and readers (reader 1 vs. reader 2) showed statistically significant differences for all comparisons: diagnostic performance of CTA was statistically significantly higher than MRA for reader 1 and 2 for the evaluation of all, glenoidal or humeral head cartilage lesions for both readers (all p≤0.04) [28]. One study by Acid et al, focusing on instability lesions, compared the diagnostic performance of CTA and MRA in assessing glenoid cartilage lesions in the same series of 40 patients [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In human literature, admixture of epinephrine and ionic contrast media is routine for CTA procedures of the joints when using diatrizoate meglumine (renografin, hypaque) (Rafii et al, 1986;McNiesh and Callaghan, 1987;Yang et al, 1987), iothalamate meglumine (Pennes et al, 1989) or ioxaglate meglumine (Hexabrix) (Vande Berg et al, 2000;Vande Berg et al, 2002;Mutschler et al, 2003;Lecouvet et al, 2007). Other investigators who use Ioxaglate meglumine (Hexabrix) for CTA do not add epinephrine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, no consensus has been established on the need for dilution, which mainly depends on the radiologists' preferences (Lecouvet et al, 2007). In this study, the contrast medium (Omnipaque 240) was diluted to 100 mg/ml with sterile saline (0.9% NaCl).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 Combined with three-dimensional reconstruction of the bone structure, useful information is yielded.…”
Section: Imaging Evaluation Of Cartilage Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%