Abstract:Objective. It is currently unknown whether human cartilage properties change during short periods of partial load bearing. We used a post-ankle fracture model to explore whether changes in cartilage morphology occur in the knee under conditions of partial load bearing.Methods. The knees of 20 patients with Weber type B and type C fractures were examined using magnetic resonance imaging. The first scan was obtained shortly (mean ؎ SD 3.2 ؎ 3.0 days) after the injury, and a second scan was obtained 7 weeks later… Show more
“…These biomechanical alterations would also likely affect articular cartilage health, as articular cartilage health depends upon appropriate knee jointloading patterns. 14,37 An unloading strategy might also result in chronic bilateral strength asymmetry 38 because this potential unloading strategy implies altered loading characteristics for the uninvolved lower extremity. For example, if impulse due to vertical GRF is decreased for the involved lower extremity, the same impulse must increase for the uninvolved lower extremity to adequately support the center of mass during walking.…”
Context: Knee injuries are prevalent, and the associated knee pain is linked to disability. The influence of knee pain on movement biomechanics, independent of other factors related to knee injuries, is difficult to study and unclear.Objective: (1) To evaluate a novel experimental knee-pain model and (2) better understand the independent effects of knee pain on walking and running biomechanics.Design: Crossover study. Setting: Biomechanics laboratory.Patients or Other Participants: Twelve able-bodied volunteers (age ¼ 23 6 3 years, height ¼ 1.73 6 0.09 m, mass ¼ 75 6 14 kg).Intervention(s): Participants walked and ran at 3 time intervals (preinfusion, infusion, and postinfusion) for 3 experimental conditions (control, sham, and pain). During the infusion time interval for the pain and sham conditions, hypertonic or isotonic saline, respectively, was continuously infused into the right infrapatellar fat pad for 22 minutes.Main Outcome Measure(s): We used repeated-measures analyses of variance to evaluate the effects of time and condition on (1) perceived knee pain and (2) key biomechanical characteristics (ground reaction forces, and joint kinematics and kinetics) of walking and running (P , .05).Results: The hypertonic saline infusion (1) increased perceived knee pain throughout the infusion and (2) reduced discrete characteristics of each component of the walking ground reaction force, walking peak plantar-flexion angle (range ¼ 628-678), walking peak plantar-flexion moment (range ¼ 95-104 NÁm), walking peak knee-extension moment (range ¼ 36-49 NÁm), walking peak hip-abduction moment (range ¼ 62-73 NÁm), walking peak support moment (range ¼ 178-207 NÁm), running peak plantar-flexion angle (range ¼ 388-778), and running peak hip-adduction angle (range ¼ 5-218).Conclusions: This novel experimental knee pain model consistently increased perceived pain during various human movements and produced altered running and walking biomechanics that may cause abnormal knee joint-loading patterns.
“…These biomechanical alterations would also likely affect articular cartilage health, as articular cartilage health depends upon appropriate knee jointloading patterns. 14,37 An unloading strategy might also result in chronic bilateral strength asymmetry 38 because this potential unloading strategy implies altered loading characteristics for the uninvolved lower extremity. For example, if impulse due to vertical GRF is decreased for the involved lower extremity, the same impulse must increase for the uninvolved lower extremity to adequately support the center of mass during walking.…”
Context: Knee injuries are prevalent, and the associated knee pain is linked to disability. The influence of knee pain on movement biomechanics, independent of other factors related to knee injuries, is difficult to study and unclear.Objective: (1) To evaluate a novel experimental knee-pain model and (2) better understand the independent effects of knee pain on walking and running biomechanics.Design: Crossover study. Setting: Biomechanics laboratory.Patients or Other Participants: Twelve able-bodied volunteers (age ¼ 23 6 3 years, height ¼ 1.73 6 0.09 m, mass ¼ 75 6 14 kg).Intervention(s): Participants walked and ran at 3 time intervals (preinfusion, infusion, and postinfusion) for 3 experimental conditions (control, sham, and pain). During the infusion time interval for the pain and sham conditions, hypertonic or isotonic saline, respectively, was continuously infused into the right infrapatellar fat pad for 22 minutes.Main Outcome Measure(s): We used repeated-measures analyses of variance to evaluate the effects of time and condition on (1) perceived knee pain and (2) key biomechanical characteristics (ground reaction forces, and joint kinematics and kinetics) of walking and running (P , .05).Results: The hypertonic saline infusion (1) increased perceived knee pain throughout the infusion and (2) reduced discrete characteristics of each component of the walking ground reaction force, walking peak plantar-flexion angle (range ¼ 628-678), walking peak plantar-flexion moment (range ¼ 95-104 NÁm), walking peak knee-extension moment (range ¼ 36-49 NÁm), walking peak hip-abduction moment (range ¼ 62-73 NÁm), walking peak support moment (range ¼ 178-207 NÁm), running peak plantar-flexion angle (range ¼ 388-778), and running peak hip-adduction angle (range ¼ 5-218).Conclusions: This novel experimental knee pain model consistently increased perceived pain during various human movements and produced altered running and walking biomechanics that may cause abnormal knee joint-loading patterns.
“…47,60 These in vitro findings are consistent with results of animal studies and investigations in humans. 20,35,64,67 The absence of mechanical stimulation has been shown to lead to a decrease in cartilage thickness, leading to some process of cartilage atrophy. 35,64,67 However, it is still unclear whether and how these findings can be directly implemented in the conservative management of patients with articular cartilage lesions, particularly full-thickness articular cartilage lesions.…”
“…The current concepts of rehabilitation following cartilage repair in the athlete are based on a combination of basic science data, the surgical techniques currently available, empirical information, and a limited number of clinical studies. 5,37,39,45,48,52,62,69,71,72,74,76,92,107,136,147,154,155,190,191 Due to the complex nature of cartilage repair and variable defect characteristics and comorbidities, an individualized rehabilitation approach should be used for every athlete following articular cartilage restoration (TABLE 1). The progression through the rehabilitation process is determined by the biology of the repair technique, characteristics of the cartilage injury, clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and the athlete's sport-specific demand.…”
Section: Rehabilitation After Articular Cartilage Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,71,92 In the early postoperative phase, the challenge is to construct an individualized rehabilitation program that provides appropriate stimulation, while avoiding mechanical loading that may be detrimental to the repair tissue. Due to the differences introduced by different cartilage repair techniques, lesion characteristics, and concomitant procedures, the initial limit and progression of weight-bearing activities should be individually determined by the surgical and rehabilitation teams for each athlete.…”
Section: Phase 1: Protection and Joint Activationmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.