The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1002/art.20378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartilage atrophy in the knees of patients after seven weeks of partial load bearing

Abstract: Objective. It is currently unknown whether human cartilage properties change during short periods of partial load bearing. We used a post-ankle fracture model to explore whether changes in cartilage morphology occur in the knee under conditions of partial load bearing.Methods. The knees of 20 patients with Weber type B and type C fractures were examined using magnetic resonance imaging. The first scan was obtained shortly (mean ؎ SD 3.2 ؎ 3.0 days) after the injury, and a second scan was obtained 7 weeks later… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
67
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These biomechanical alterations would also likely affect articular cartilage health, as articular cartilage health depends upon appropriate knee jointloading patterns. 14,37 An unloading strategy might also result in chronic bilateral strength asymmetry 38 because this potential unloading strategy implies altered loading characteristics for the uninvolved lower extremity. For example, if impulse due to vertical GRF is decreased for the involved lower extremity, the same impulse must increase for the uninvolved lower extremity to adequately support the center of mass during walking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These biomechanical alterations would also likely affect articular cartilage health, as articular cartilage health depends upon appropriate knee jointloading patterns. 14,37 An unloading strategy might also result in chronic bilateral strength asymmetry 38 because this potential unloading strategy implies altered loading characteristics for the uninvolved lower extremity. For example, if impulse due to vertical GRF is decreased for the involved lower extremity, the same impulse must increase for the uninvolved lower extremity to adequately support the center of mass during walking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,60 These in vitro findings are consistent with results of animal studies and investigations in humans. 20,35,64,67 The absence of mechanical stimulation has been shown to lead to a decrease in cartilage thickness, leading to some process of cartilage atrophy. 35,64,67 However, it is still unclear whether and how these findings can be directly implemented in the conservative management of patients with articular cartilage lesions, particularly full-thickness articular cartilage lesions.…”
Section: T T Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current concepts of rehabilitation following cartilage repair in the athlete are based on a combination of basic science data, the surgical techniques currently available, empirical information, and a limited number of clinical studies. 5,37,39,45,48,52,62,69,71,72,74,76,92,107,136,147,154,155,190,191 Due to the complex nature of cartilage repair and variable defect characteristics and comorbidities, an individualized rehabilitation approach should be used for every athlete following articular cartilage restoration (TABLE 1). The progression through the rehabilitation process is determined by the biology of the repair technique, characteristics of the cartilage injury, clinical symptoms, radiographic findings, and the athlete's sport-specific demand.…”
Section: Rehabilitation After Articular Cartilage Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,71,92 In the early postoperative phase, the challenge is to construct an individualized rehabilitation program that provides appropriate stimulation, while avoiding mechanical loading that may be detrimental to the repair tissue. Due to the differences introduced by different cartilage repair techniques, lesion characteristics, and concomitant procedures, the initial limit and progression of weight-bearing activities should be individually determined by the surgical and rehabilitation teams for each athlete.…”
Section: Phase 1: Protection and Joint Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%