ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Sketches on - SIGGRAPH '05 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1187112.1187279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartesian grid fluid simulation with irregular boundary voxels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 shows the liquid and air velocity samples and face fractions on a cell containing air and liquid, where the tangential velocities of the two fluids are discontinuous. In MultiFLIP, the net flux across each face is computed as a weighted sum of the liquid and air velocities (figure 9), similarly to the scheme used by Roble et al [2005] for solid boundaries. In 2-D, this can be expressed as…”
Section: Particle-derived Level Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the liquid and air velocity samples and face fractions on a cell containing air and liquid, where the tangential velocities of the two fluids are discontinuous. In MultiFLIP, the net flux across each face is computed as a weighted sum of the liquid and air velocities (figure 9), similarly to the scheme used by Roble et al [2005] for solid boundaries. In 2-D, this can be expressed as…”
Section: Particle-derived Level Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their use in computer graphics was rst suggested by Roble et al [2005], who proposed a simple modi cation to regular pressure projection that allows for more accurate enforcement of static solid boundary conditions. The variational formulation of Batty et al [2007] similarly treated two-way rigid body interactions by casting the coupled pressure solve in an energy minimization form that accounts for partial cell volumes in three dimensions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach we take is to generalize an increasingly popular family of symmetric positive-de nite cut-cell uid methods [Azevedo et al 2016;Batty et al 2007;Bridson 2015;Gibou and Min 2012;Ng et al 2009;Roble et al 2005;Weber et al 2015] to the case of strongly (or monolithically) coupled two-way interactions with deformable solids, in which solid and uid dynamics are solved simultaneously. To reconcile the Eulerian uid and Lagrangian solid domains, we construct a mutually conforming cut-cell mesh at each frame by clipping the cells of the uid grid against the deformable solid object's geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods use accurate normals in an attempt to enforce correct boundary conditions [16], or modify the calculations performed in boundary cells to capture object geometries [17], [18], but they still suffer from artifacts or face difficulties being evaluated robustly [10]. There are also techniques that try to capture fine fluid motion detail only where needed by using octrees [19], [20], simplicial meshes [15], [21]- [23] or moving domain representations [24], [25], and techniques that simulate fluids on 3D surfaces of arbitrary topology [3], [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%