2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartesian genetic programming for diagnosis of Parkinson disease through handwriting analysis: Performance vs. interpretability issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parziale et al [31] addressed a recurrent issue in most published works, clinical interpretability. More specifically, authors frequently use handcrafted features poorly linked to physiological processes and employ less interpretable machine learning models (so-called black boxes).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parziale et al [31] addressed a recurrent issue in most published works, clinical interpretability. More specifically, authors frequently use handcrafted features poorly linked to physiological processes and employ less interpretable machine learning models (so-called black boxes).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other works also use vision sensors [ 14 , 17 , 18 ]. Alternatively, some methods for evaluating PD rely on tablets [ 23 , 24 ] or scanner devices [ 25 ] for handwriting analysis, or microphones for analysing speech [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning algorithms mainly use raw data or extracted features along with classification methods, such as artificial neural networks (ANN) [ 12 , 13 , 16 , 20 , 21 , 24 ], random forests (RF) [ 14 , 15 , 19 , 23 , 26 ], support vector machines (SVM) [ 22 , 23 ], and k -nearest neighbours (KNN) [ 26 ], among others. For example, in [ 20 , 21 ], restricted Boltzmann machines are trained using features extracted from wrist-worn accelerometer data in a home environment to predict PD state.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have designed batteries to detect features such as variability of spiral width, overall shape, spiral smoothness, pen velocity, and pen pressure. Advancements in digital spiral drawing, computerized feature analysis, drawing task design, and complex machine learning techniques established greater diagnostic ability, achieving impressive classification accuracies ranging from 79.78% to 97.52% [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.82 to 0.992 [33,[36][37][38]. Research has continued to refine, augment, and standardize Archimedean spiral drawing assessments, exploring novel informative features for PD detection [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Archimedean Spiral Drawings For Diagnosis Of Parkinson's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%