“…Estimated T 1 and T 2 values were in agreement with literature values, with coefficients of variance (CoVs) of ∼4.6% and ∼2.6%, respectively. The combination of IR and T2prep for parametric encoding has been used in several studies [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , using both exponential fitting and dictionary matching, and have provided high-accuracy cardiac T 1 and T 2 quantification [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] . Joint T 1 /T 2 estimation has also been developed using saturation recovery (SR) instead of IR, acquired in a single breath-hold [16] , achieving a resolution of 2 × 2 × 8 mm 3 with a scan time of ∼13 s. Negligible biases were observed relative to saturation recovery single-shot acquisition (SASHA; ∼−9.6 ms) and T2prep-balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP; ∼0.7 ms) for T 1 and T 2 , respectively, along with similar precision (estimated via the standard deviation in each heart segment).…”