2005
DOI: 10.1080/17486830508415768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrots or sticks? The Use of Incentives to Achieve Social Policy Goals in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Australian Council of Social Services (2007) reports that high levels of unmet needs for community services generally do not compare favorably with other OECD countries. Additionally, there has been an increase in middle-class welfare provisions, whereby, for example, the government subsidizes private health-care contributions, offers first home buyer cash grants (not means tested) and some child-care rebates (Chenoweth, Warburton, & Buckley, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian Council of Social Services (2007) reports that high levels of unmet needs for community services generally do not compare favorably with other OECD countries. Additionally, there has been an increase in middle-class welfare provisions, whereby, for example, the government subsidizes private health-care contributions, offers first home buyer cash grants (not means tested) and some child-care rebates (Chenoweth, Warburton, & Buckley, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%