2020
DOI: 10.1108/cg-10-2018-0317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carroll’s dimensions and CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Pakistan

Abstract: Purpose This study aims to ascertain the relevance of Carroll’s four dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR), namely, economic, legal, ethical and discretionary in a dynamic regulatory context of a developing economy – Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach This study has operationalized these dimensions as four categories of CSR disclosure index. This disclosure index measured the relevance of CSR dimensions by examining CSR disclosure practices of Pakistan Stock Exchange-100 index firms. Findi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(103 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSRD studies in developing countries mainly focused on a narrow range of emerging economies including Malaysia, Indonesia, South Africa, and China, which falls in line with the findings of other literature review studies (Ali et al, 2017;Fifka, 2011) and there is a limited number of CSRD studies undertaken in the developing context (Alotaibi and Hussainey, 2016;Hamid et al, 2020;Ismail et al, 2018;Kamel and Awadallah, 2017;Khemir and Baccouche, 2010). Therefore, there is a need for further investigation on the CSRD studies in developing countries, specifically in Malaysia context.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosuresupporting
confidence: 52%
“…CSRD studies in developing countries mainly focused on a narrow range of emerging economies including Malaysia, Indonesia, South Africa, and China, which falls in line with the findings of other literature review studies (Ali et al, 2017;Fifka, 2011) and there is a limited number of CSRD studies undertaken in the developing context (Alotaibi and Hussainey, 2016;Hamid et al, 2020;Ismail et al, 2018;Kamel and Awadallah, 2017;Khemir and Baccouche, 2010). Therefore, there is a need for further investigation on the CSRD studies in developing countries, specifically in Malaysia context.…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosuresupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The implications of our study are both practical and theoretical. Our results have important practical implications for governments and national agencies, suggesting that sustainability reporting should be promoted in developing economies where CSR should be key to accelerating transition into a developed economy (Chatterjee and Mitra, 2017); in fact, developing countries in Asia are promoting CSR regulatory initiatives in order not to lag behind developed countries (Hamid et al , 2020). These types of policies could be introduced with non-mandatory guidance (which can be effective according to Tauringana and Chithambo, 2015) or even with mandatory requirements, especially for larger firms and firms in polluting sectors, as they are less prone to disclose this information, according to our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first theoretical group in CSR is called the "CSR tool", in which all social actions of business are accepted only if they contribute to the process of wealth creation, for example, organizational strategies that can be equitable and competitive [41]. The second set of theories is called "political ideology", in which the organization accepts a certain level of human rights and activities and participates in a certain level of social cooperation; for example, the theory of integrated citizenship and the theory of social harmony [42]. The third group of theories is called "integrated theory", in which business is assumed to be dependent on society for its growth and beliefs, and it is important for business to integrate social needs; for example, theories of social productivity and stakeholder management [43].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%