2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.186806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier Transport in Two-Dimensional Graphene Layers

Abstract: Carrier transport in gated 2D graphene monolayers is theoretically considered in the presence of scattering by random charged impurity centers with density ni. Excellent quantitative agreement is obtained (for carrier density n > 10 12 cm −2 ) with existing experimental data (Ref. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). The conductivity scales linearly with n/ni in the theory, and shows extremely weak temperature dependence. The experimentally observed asymmetry between electron and hole conductivities is explained by the asymmetry i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

54
1,108
4
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,175 publications
(1,169 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
54
1,108
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Coulomb scattering in 2D TMDCs is caused by random charged impurities located within the 2D TMDC layer or on its surfaces, and is the dominant scattering effect at low temperatures, as it is for graphene 105 . Engineering the dielectric environment can enhance mobilities 106 , as has been demonstrated for graphene 107,108 and for MoS 2 (ref.…”
Section: Electrical Transport and Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coulomb scattering in 2D TMDCs is caused by random charged impurities located within the 2D TMDC layer or on its surfaces, and is the dominant scattering effect at low temperatures, as it is for graphene 105 . Engineering the dielectric environment can enhance mobilities 106 , as has been demonstrated for graphene 107,108 and for MoS 2 (ref.…”
Section: Electrical Transport and Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphene placed on a dielectric material such as SiO 2 , however, experiences scattering due to surface polar phonons in the SiO 2 (ref. 102), and in freely suspended graphene 105,109 the primary scattering is due to out-of-plane flexural phonons 112 . Additionally, freestanding MoS 2 has been shown to have similar ripples 113 to those in graphene, which may also contribute to scattering and mobility reduction.…”
Section: Electrical Transport and Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, k F is the Fermi wavevector, and the dimensionless function F (a) is defined in ref. [24]. κ avg is given by the average relative dielectric constant of the two regions surrounding graphene: κ avg = (κ top + κ bottom )/2.…”
Section: Ionized Impurity Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a nominal charged impurity concentration of n imp ∼ 10 11 /cm 2 is present at a graphene/high-κ dielectric interface, for carrier concentrations ≤ 10 12 /cm 2 , acoustic phonon scattering at RT is also relatively insignificant owing to the low density of states of graphene at the Fermi energy (see [21][22][23][24]). In this technologically relevant regime, the competing effects of impurity and SO-phonon scattering are responsible for the low-field transport properties of graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that the emergent divergent longitudinal resistivity at the graphene Dirac point could equally well be considered a putative Hall insulator phase, which in this context, is equivalent to the zero Fermi energy ν = 0 QHE in graphene with σ xx = 0 and ρ xy ∼ 0. The only (qualitative) difference between graphene and 2D semiconductor systems is that the graphene Dirac point is known to be dominated by density inhomogeneities associated with the electronhole puddles, 25,26,27,28,29 which lead to considerable density fluctuations around the average (expected) zero density at the Dirac point. This means that there will be considerable fluctuations around the expected ρ xy = 0 value in the graphene Hall insulator phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%