“…[15,28,29] Typically, high-performing OSCs exhibit E gap /q − V OC losses greater than 0.8 V. [30] To give an example, the highly investigated benchmark system poly [4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo [1,2-b;4,5-b'] dithiophene-2,6-diyl-alt-(4-(2-ethylhexyl)-3-fluorothieno [3,4-b] thiophene-)-2-carboxylate-2-6-diyl)]: [6,6]-phenyl-C 71 -butyric acid methyl ester that achieves PCEs greater than 10% exhibits a fundamental bandgap of around 1.7 eV, while the solar cell V OC is around 0.81 V. [30] The resulting voltage loss of 0.89 V is far beyond the thermodynamic limit of 0.3 V, which is described by the Shockley-Queisser (SQ) theory for an idealized solar cell. [15,28,29] Typically, high-performing OSCs exhibit E gap /q − V OC losses greater than 0.8 V. [30] To give an example, the highly investigated benchmark system poly [4,8-bis(5-(2-ethylhexyl)thiophen-2-yl)benzo [1,2-b;4,5-b'] dithiophene-2,6-diyl-alt-(4-(2-ethylhexyl)-3-fluorothieno [3,4-b] thiophene-)-2-carboxylate-2-6-diyl)]: [6,6]-phenyl-C 71 -butyric acid methyl ester that achieves PCEs greater than 10% exhibits a fundamental bandgap of around 1.7 eV, while the solar cell V OC is around 0.81 V. [30] The resulting voltage loss of 0.89 V is far beyond the thermodynamic limit of 0.3 V, which is described by the Shockley-Queisser (SQ) theory for an idealized solar cell.…”