Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1364/ofc.2014.w4k.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier Phase Estimation for DP-16QAM Using QPSK Partitioning and Quasi-Multiplier-Free Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, results in Fig. 8(d) Table 1 lists the complexity comparison between BPS [13], [14], MBB [9] and the proposed PH algorithm. Taking the same BER at 2.7 × 10 −4 as an example, 30 test phases are required for single stage BPS and single-stage PH algorithm, while 16 (8 + 8) test phases are needed for 2-stage PH algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of 1-and 2-stage Ph Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, results in Fig. 8(d) Table 1 lists the complexity comparison between BPS [13], [14], MBB [9] and the proposed PH algorithm. Taking the same BER at 2.7 × 10 −4 as an example, 30 test phases are required for single stage BPS and single-stage PH algorithm, while 16 (8 + 8) test phases are needed for 2-stage PH algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of 1-and 2-stage Ph Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%