2016
DOI: 10.14712/18059694.2016.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier molecules and extraction of circulating tumor DNA for next generation sequencing in colorectal cancer

Abstract: Summary:The aims of the study were: i) to compare circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) yields obtained by different manual extraction procedures, ii) to evaluate the addition of various carrier molecules into the plasma to improve ctDNA extraction recovery, and iii) to use next generation sequencing (NGS) technology to analyze KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS somatic mutations in ctDNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Venous blood was obtained from patients who suffered from metastatic colorectal carcinoma. For p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since interaction effects between the method for cfDNA extraction and the method applied for mutation detection may lead to increased artifacts, careful comparison during establishing liquid biopsy procedures is warranted . Different abilities to recover longer or shorter fragments have been described in the literature . Besides biological and pathological parameters reviewed above in chapter 1, the concentration of isolated cfDNA is influenced by the efficiency of the DNA extraction method and the final elution volume of the respective method.…”
Section: Cfdna Extraction From Blood and Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since interaction effects between the method for cfDNA extraction and the method applied for mutation detection may lead to increased artifacts, careful comparison during establishing liquid biopsy procedures is warranted . Different abilities to recover longer or shorter fragments have been described in the literature . Besides biological and pathological parameters reviewed above in chapter 1, the concentration of isolated cfDNA is influenced by the efficiency of the DNA extraction method and the final elution volume of the respective method.…”
Section: Cfdna Extraction From Blood and Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78,83 Different abilities to recover longer or shorter fragments have been described in the literature. 84,85 Besides biological and pathological parameters reviewed above in chapter 1, the concentration of isolated cfDNA is influenced by the efficiency of the DNA extraction method and the final elution volume of the respective method. In a comparative study, cfDNA concentrations from identical artificially spiked plasma samples extracted at 56 different laboratories revealed wide variations in cfDNA yields ranging from 2.87 to 224.02 ng/mL with a median of 23.15 ng/mL of plasma.…”
Section: Cf D Na E Xtr Ac Ti On Fr Om Bl Ood a Nd Oth E R M A Te Rimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CtDNA can be detected by PCR-based methods that are highly sensitive, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). However, the number of detected mutations is limited for this method, and therefore, it may not always be able to detect mutations of interest (10,(12)(13)(14). Using broader next-generation sequencing (NGS) sequencing panels may overcome these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because naturally occurring carriers, such as salmon sperm DNA, contain rDNA sequences with partial homology to other eukaryotic DNA, we chose a synthetic carrier, polyadenylic acid, which has shown efficacy in enhancing recovery of low abundance DNA from human biological samples. [43] Supplementation of carrier DNA increased both overall (data not shown)and fungal-specific DNA yields 2-4 fold across all samples (Figure 1C). The best combination of all techniques tested resulted in an almost 14-fold increase in fungal DNA yields, comprising an optimal protocol utilizing low-speed centrifugation, enzymatic, mechanical, and thermal cell wall disruption, inclusion of carrier DNA, and proteinase K digestion in combination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%