2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.68.184504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier-density-dependent momentum shift of the coherent peak and the LO phonon mode inp-type high-Tcsuperconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

33
146
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
33
146
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of the 2-magnon process could change when antiferromagnetic CuO 2 layers are doped, but the energy of the peak intensity provides a measure of the effective J describing the magnetic correlations. Figure 46 shows B 1g -symmetry Raman spectra for four cuprate families as a function of doping, from Sugai et al [80]. For each of the antiferromagnetic parent compounds, one can see a strong 2-magnon peak centered at 2500-3000 cm −1 ≈ 310-380 meV.…”
Section: -Magnon Raman Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the 2-magnon process could change when antiferromagnetic CuO 2 layers are doped, but the energy of the peak intensity provides a measure of the effective J describing the magnetic correlations. Figure 46 shows B 1g -symmetry Raman spectra for four cuprate families as a function of doping, from Sugai et al [80]. For each of the antiferromagnetic parent compounds, one can see a strong 2-magnon peak centered at 2500-3000 cm −1 ≈ 310-380 meV.…”
Section: -Magnon Raman Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of the hole-doped high-T c cuprates, while the two-magnon peak of the AF parent compounds is relatively sharp in the B 1g spectra, it becomes broader and the peak energy becomes smaller with hole doping. 44 However, because Se substitution is isovalent doping and the parent compound Fe 1.074 Te is an itinerant antiferromagnet, while the parent compound of the high-T c cuprates is an antiferromagnetic insulator, it may be reasonable that doping dependence is so different from the cuprates. Anyway from these results, we can say that almost the same magnetic excitations and/or magnetic fluctuations exist even in the superconducting FeTe 0.6 Se 0.4 with the antiferromagnetic Fe 1.074 Te.…”
Section: B Two-magnon Raman Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy scale given by two-magnon excitations in optimally doped Bi2212 cuprates [43] is J ~ ω(2M)/2.7 = = 833 K (573 cm -1 ), which is almost two times less than in the parent compound (J ~ 1150 cm -1 [44] provide an estimate T c ~ 0.3J = 250 K, which is well above the experimental value. For estimates below, we will use empirical relation T c ~ 0.1J, calculated for T c ~90 K, J = = 833 K. One of the missing parameters for discussion is doping dependence of J, which we derive from the paper by Sugai et al [43] to be dJ/dδ = -6.4·10 3 K, δ -doping parameter, δ = 0.16 for optimum doping [43].…”
Section: Antiferromagnetic Fluctuations As Pairing Glue For High-t C mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For estimates below, we will use empirical relation T c ~ 0.1J, calculated for T c ~90 K, J = = 833 K. One of the missing parameters for discussion is doping dependence of J, which we derive from the paper by Sugai et al [43] to be dJ/dδ = -6.4·10 3 K, δ -doping parameter, δ = 0.16 for optimum doping [43]. It is interesting to note here that pairing temperature T * = 0.3J, as estimated from the Hubbard model [44], follows closely pseudogap dependence [45] in Bi2212 material.…”
Section: Antiferromagnetic Fluctuations As Pairing Glue For High-t C mentioning
confidence: 99%