2015
DOI: 10.5853/jos.2015.17.3.359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotid Stump as a Cause of Recurrent Embolism–Endovascular Treatment in a Case of Congenital Carotid Stump Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the patient also presents severe atherosclerotic stenosis, treatment with carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy is favorable; both treatments require an adequate distal protection device to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events [ 9 , 14 ]. Recurrent cerebrovascular events can originate from an arterial stump in a similar condition called carotid stump syndrome [ 15 ]; therefore, the risk of thromboembolic events during procedures cannot be overlooked in cases of an NBCA combined with an arterial stump, because the arterial stump may produce a turbulent flow in the NBCA. For patients in need of carotid intervention, preoperative evaluation of the branching pattern and stenosis region helps the surgeon in selecting a suitable distal protection device [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the patient also presents severe atherosclerotic stenosis, treatment with carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy is favorable; both treatments require an adequate distal protection device to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events [ 9 , 14 ]. Recurrent cerebrovascular events can originate from an arterial stump in a similar condition called carotid stump syndrome [ 15 ]; therefore, the risk of thromboembolic events during procedures cannot be overlooked in cases of an NBCA combined with an arterial stump, because the arterial stump may produce a turbulent flow in the NBCA. For patients in need of carotid intervention, preoperative evaluation of the branching pattern and stenosis region helps the surgeon in selecting a suitable distal protection device [ 14 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hrbáčd et al randomly divided patients with CSS into 2 groups: drug therapy group (n = 10) and surgical treatment group (n = 15), and the authors reported 1 patient in the drug therapy group with stroke recurrence, while 1 patient in the surgical treatment group died of myocardial infarction. [7] Kumar et al reported that among 25 patients with CSS who underwent surgical intervention, 23 patients were relieved of symptoms. However, 1 case of facial paralysis and dysarthria, 1 case of incisional hematoma, 2 cases of cranial nerve paralysis, 1 case of visual impairment, and 1 case of death were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interventions for CSS are mostly demonstrated via case reports. Two surgical approaches of intervention are isolating the occluded stump of ICA with a covered or bare stent to prevent embolization, [711] and filling the stump of the ICA with the coils supported by the stent to correct the abnormal blood flow in the residual lumen, and hence, prevent thrombosis. [12,13] Due to various limitations, no guidelines have been recommended for the direct interventional recanalization of carotid artery occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSS was traditionally treated with the open surgical exclusion of the stump and endarterectomy of the ECA [7]. More recently, endovascular treatments involving common carotid artery (CCA)-to-ECA stenting have gained popularity [3,8,9]. Despite multiple case reports and small series of endovascular treatments for CSS, there has been no review of the existing literature to establish the efficacy and safety of endovascular intervention for the treatment of CSS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we present a systematic review of endovascular treatments for CSS and provide a case illustration of carotid stump exclusion with stent-assisted coil embolization. To our knowledge, this is the second study to describe stent-assisted coil embolization for CSS [8] and the only study to review the literature in its entirety and compile the endovascular data among these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%