2019
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.025496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotid Plaque Neovascularization Detected With Superb Microvascular Imaging Ultrasound Without Using Contrast Media

Abstract: Background and purpose: A significant proportion of ischemic strokes are caused by emboli from unstable carotid artery plaques with intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) as a key feature of plaque instability. IPN is not detectable with conventional Doppler ultrasound.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can visualize IPN, but it`s use is limited in clinical practice because it requires an intravenous injection of contrast. Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) without contrast uses an algorithm to remove clutter a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously published study showed good agreement between CEUS and SMI in the assessment of IPN (21). Zamani et al (17) reported that plaques with higher IPN grades had higher numbers of neovessels quantified at histology (P=0.041, r=0.460). In their research, however, there was no statistically significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with regard to the different levels of IMVF on SMI, which may be because of the relatively small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously published study showed good agreement between CEUS and SMI in the assessment of IPN (21). Zamani et al (17) reported that plaques with higher IPN grades had higher numbers of neovessels quantified at histology (P=0.041, r=0.460). In their research, however, there was no statistically significant difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with regard to the different levels of IMVF on SMI, which may be because of the relatively small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving enhancements were defined as intraplaque microvascular flow (IMVF), and static enhancements (considered to be tissue acoustic reflector) were excluded. IMVF levels were classified on a visual scale according to the previous study proposed by Mahtab Zamani as follows: grade 0, no IMVF or IMVF confined to the adjacent adventitia; grade 1, moving IMVF confined to the adventitial side; grade 2, moving IMVF at the plaque shoulder; grade 3, IMVF moving to the plaque core; and grade 4, extensive IMVF (17). SMI assessments were carried out in forty plaques from grade 0 to grade 4 IMVF on 2 occasions, which were >2 weeks apart to obtain the intra-and interobserver variability using κ statistics.…”
Section: Smi Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theoretical advantages of SMI have been investigated in assessment of synovial inflammation in rheumatologic conditions, as well as characterization of lesions located in thyroid gland, breast, and liver 13‐15 . Vascular applications of SMI mainly focused on characterization of carotid plaques by assessing neovascularization 16 . This could potentially identify vulnerable plaques and have important implications in stroke management 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be used to evaluate the accuracy of SMI and CEUS in predicting microvessels observed at histology. The analysis for sample size estimation are based on existing data from our recently published study [22]. In this dataset mean SMI count in the asymptomatic group was 1.8 compared to 3.0 in the symptomatic group with an expected difference in mean of 1.2.…”
Section: Statistical Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%