2014
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotid MRI Detection of Intraplaque Hemorrhage at 3T and 1.5T

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage leads to plaque progression and ischemic events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely because the effect of magnet strength on gross MPRAGE positive or negative status is small, on the order of 10% in our recent study. 37 In addition, 3-T magnets are used far less often than 1.5-T magnets in the evaluation of acute stroke at our institution. The results of this study further suggest that IPH detection can and should be used as part of stroke source workup at both magnet strengths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely because the effect of magnet strength on gross MPRAGE positive or negative status is small, on the order of 10% in our recent study. 37 In addition, 3-T magnets are used far less often than 1.5-T magnets in the evaluation of acute stroke at our institution. The results of this study further suggest that IPH detection can and should be used as part of stroke source workup at both magnet strengths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 21 To produce 3D images, we used a secondary phaseencoding gradient in the section-select direction, and measurements for all section-selection phase encodings were performed with rapid acquisition in each segment. Carotid IPH was determined by MPRAGE-positive plaque with at least 1 voxel demonstrating at least 2-fold higher signal intensity relative to adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle as previously described.…”
Section: Iph Determination By Mpragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] Carotid IPH can be detected with heavily T1-weighted sequences, including the MPRAGE sequence, which can discriminate between IPH and lipid/necrotic core. 6 MPRAGE is superior in detecting IPH compared with conventional MR imaging sequences, with higher sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability compared with 3D TOF or FSE T1WI sequences. 7 Lumen markers have been linked to IPH, including stenosis, plaque thickness, and ulceration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…34 The MPRAGE sequence selectively detects IPH as opposed to the LRNC, with the added benefit of having high inter-and intrarater reliability. 29 Because these 3D heavily T1-weighted sequences can be limited by motion and flow-related artifact, cine-MPRAGE and radially acquired stack of stars (SOS) MPRAGE were developed to allow easy separation of IPH from artifact.…”
Section: 36mentioning
confidence: 99%