2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02132-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carotid and aortic screening for coronary artery bypass grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of carotid stenosis ≥ 50% in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (CABG; CABG + valve surgery) ranges from 3.8% to 22%. [15][16][17][18][19][20] The presence of significant (≥ 70%) internal carotid artery stenosis in our Correlates of carotid stenosis in CABG patients 235 study was 7.7%. Selectively screening patients with carotid artery DUS, as opposed to screening every patient > 65 years old, would provide a more streamlined and cost-effective approach to carotid DUS prior to CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The prevalence of carotid stenosis ≥ 50% in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (CABG; CABG + valve surgery) ranges from 3.8% to 22%. [15][16][17][18][19][20] The presence of significant (≥ 70%) internal carotid artery stenosis in our Correlates of carotid stenosis in CABG patients 235 study was 7.7%. Selectively screening patients with carotid artery DUS, as opposed to screening every patient > 65 years old, would provide a more streamlined and cost-effective approach to carotid DUS prior to CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…20 Likewise, significant carotid artery stenosis is seen in 8% to 18% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery or other cardiac surgeries. 16,21,22 Therefore, the finding of carotid stenosis might prompt further evaluations for clinically silent coronary artery disease in some cases.…”
Section: Ultrasound For Carotid Artery Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplex sonography constitutes the most common imaging method for screening patients undergoing major vascular and cardiac surgery [7][8][9][10], but has drawbacks due to technical difficulties, overestimation of lesions in cases of bilateral disease [11], and problems in evaluating occlusions and complex anatomy [12] may be exacerbated by the characteristic abnormalities in flow velocity pattern due, for example, to an aortic stenosis with increased acceleration time, decreased peak velocity and a delayed upstroke [13]. Moreover, true ultrasound imaging is sometimes impended by extensive calcification and the examination is insufficient in maximally 5% of patients with high grade stenosis.…”
Section: Carotid Artery Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%