One Hundredth Anniversary Volume 2005
DOI: 10.5382/av100.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carlin-Type Gold Deposits in Nevada<subtitle>Critical Geologic Characteristics and Viable Models</subtitle>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
124
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
7
124
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing the geological characteristics of different types of gold deposits, it is clear that the Zhuanshanzi gold deposit is not a typical orogenic gold deposit because the ore‐forming fluid of a typical orogenic gold deposit is mainly metamorphic fluid (Groves et al, ; Kerrich et al, ), while there is no evidence for the existence of metamorphic fluids in the Zhuanshanzi gold deposit. There is a large amount of free gold in the Zhuanshanzi gold deposit, and it is obviously different from a Carlin‐type gold deposit characterized by invisible gold (Cline et al, ). Numerous studies show that a magmatic hydrothermal metallogenic system generally develops in a plate‐collision orogenic environment, a tensile environment, or an intraplate rift environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By comparing the geological characteristics of different types of gold deposits, it is clear that the Zhuanshanzi gold deposit is not a typical orogenic gold deposit because the ore‐forming fluid of a typical orogenic gold deposit is mainly metamorphic fluid (Groves et al, ; Kerrich et al, ), while there is no evidence for the existence of metamorphic fluids in the Zhuanshanzi gold deposit. There is a large amount of free gold in the Zhuanshanzi gold deposit, and it is obviously different from a Carlin‐type gold deposit characterized by invisible gold (Cline et al, ). Numerous studies show that a magmatic hydrothermal metallogenic system generally develops in a plate‐collision orogenic environment, a tensile environment, or an intraplate rift environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This imparts an inherent bias toward recognition of structures that have a significant E or W component to their strike, a fact that must be considered when using these data to eliminate, rather than support, the existence of structures. Additionally, estimation of the magnitude of Cretaceous to Eocene exhumation of upper crustal rocks across the eastern hinterland remains difficult for several reasons: (1) the thickness of Upper Paleozoic rocks is highly variable across the region, from ∼3.5 to ∼9 km in thickness; (2) the thickness of Mesozoic strata which may have blanketed part of the region is incompletely understood; Triassic sedimentary deposits are mostly preserved in the cores of synclines, and Lower Jurassic sedimentary deposits shown to have stratigraphic and provenance correlations to the Lower Jurassic strata of the Colorado Plateau are restricted to the single western occurrence near Currie, NV [e.g., Lucas and Orchard , 2007]; (3) Conodont CAI values represent the most regionally extensive data but due to the semiquantitative nature of this empirical geothermometer, and the sensitivity to temperature duration in addition to temperature magnitude [e.g., Rejebian et al , 1987], the utility of the measure is limited; (4) with few exceptions [i.e., Cline et al , 2005] regional low‐temperature thermochronometry studies of the Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks necessary to assess the magnitude of exhumation are lacking.…”
Section: Sub‐tertiary Unconformitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor 3, with high loadings for As, Fe, V, and Au, contains elements that are common in pyrite (Large et al, 2009). Diagenetic pyrite may contain V (Large et al, 2009), whereas As and Au are characteristic of ore-stage pyrite at Meikle and other Carlin-type gold deposits (Hofstra and Cline, 2000;Cline et al, 2005). Although we selected what appeared to be fresh samples, HZD from the Meikle and Windfall Carlin-type gold deposits has the highest Factor 3 scores and exhibits a linear correlation between As and Fe+S that Diehl et al (2005) attributed to inclusions of arsenian pyrite.…”
Section: Mineral Hill Dissolution Etching Sulfide Minerals Vo Vo Vo Vmentioning
confidence: 99%