2017
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2017007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carleman estimates and Unique Continuation Property for 1-D viscous Camassa-Holm equation

Abstract: This paper is devoted to studying the 1-D viscous Camassa-Holm equation on a bounded interval. We first deduce the existence and uniqueness of strong solution to the viscous Camassa-Holm equation by using Galerkin method. Then we establish an identity for a second order parabolic operator, by applying this identity we obtain two global Carleman estimates for the linear viscous Camassa-Holm operator. Based on these estimates, we obtain two types of Unique Continuation Property for the viscous Camassa-Holm equat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the left-hand side of the first inequality in (12), concluding that (12) also holds for (11). Now, we prove (12) for (13). Indeed, set u = θq, we have…”
Section: Proposition 3 Let Q Be the Solution Ofmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…with the left-hand side of the first inequality in (12), concluding that (12) also holds for (11). Now, we prove (12) for (13). Indeed, set u = θq, we have…”
Section: Proposition 3 Let Q Be the Solution Ofmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The main difficulty in establishing global Carleman estimates for the linear stochastic nonclassical diffusion equations is the existence of the term dy xx , this term in the equation introduces significant new technical difficulties, the traditional method does not work in this case. To deal with the term dy xx , we use the method developed in [13].…”
Section: • • • • •mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main idea in this part comes from previous studies. 19,[51][52][53] Step1. Approximate solution.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%