2019
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caring for aged people: The influence of personal resilience and workplace climate on ‘doing good’ and ‘feeling good’

Abstract: Aims This study examines the impact of personal resilience on the well‐being of care workers and how perceptions of the quality of care provided and the social climate in the organization influences this relationship. We examine quality of patient care as both a mediating and outcome variable to better understand if ‘doing good’ (quality of care) leads to ‘feeling good’ (personal well‐being). Background As an ageing population and the care for the older people has become an increasing challenge to many societi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And in this process, nurses as individuals will also deliver better performance. As mentioned in previous studies, a social climate of mutual cooperation and trust among nurses increases patient care quality (McNeil et al., 2019). In summary, in groups with high group organisational citizenship behaviour levels, in terms of both personal motivation and the help of others, nurses are more likely to deliver better performance in patient care, leading to better nurse–patient relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…And in this process, nurses as individuals will also deliver better performance. As mentioned in previous studies, a social climate of mutual cooperation and trust among nurses increases patient care quality (McNeil et al., 2019). In summary, in groups with high group organisational citizenship behaviour levels, in terms of both personal motivation and the help of others, nurses are more likely to deliver better performance in patient care, leading to better nurse–patient relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Nine papers originated from the USA (Berridge et al 2018; Berridge et al 2020; Boerner et al 2017; Castle 2013; Choi & Johantgen 2012; Dreher et al 2019; Lane & McGrady 2018; Yeatts et al 2010; Yeatts et al 2018), five from the UK (Moss & Meyer 2019; Scottish Care 2019; British Geriatrics Society 2020; Rajan & Mckee 2020; University College London 2020), four from Canada (Berta et al 2018; Bethell et al 2018; Braedley et al 2018; Caspar et al 2020), three from Sweden (Beck et al 2015; Ericson-Lidman & Ahlin 2017; Wallin et al 2012), and two from Switzerland (Gaudenz et al 2019; Schwendimann et al 2016), Japan (Fukuda et al 2018; Nakanishi & Imai 2012), Portugal (Barbosa et al 2015a; Barbosa et al 2015b), and Australia (King et al 2013; McNeil et al 2019). One paper was published by an international organisation (World Health Organisation 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General characteristics of the included papers are outlined in Table 2. Barbosa et al 2015b), and Australia (King et al 2013;McNeil et al 2019). One paper was published by an international organisation (World Health Organisation 2020).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, scholars have elaborated that the workforce must be able to handle stress and strain in any kind of situation (Degbey and Einola, 2019). Employees with the potential to control their surroundings become the vanguard of leadership and champion others within an entity (McNeil et al, 2019). Based on this logic, individual personal resources are important factors that trigger motivation and inspiration in employees to combat the negative and undesired effects of politics (Landells and Albrecht, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%