“…What arises from this second vision of cosmopolitanism is an awareness of the importance of relationality, intersubjectivity, and what Judith Butler sees as an endless undertaking of subjects being '(re)constituted through dialectical processes of recognition, within multiple networks of power' (Mitchell, 2007, p. 711). So, while conventional cosmopolitanism advocates an ethics based on universal rights and responsibilities, its critical variant is founded upon a feminist ethics of care that conceives of ethics as something that cannot be set out as abstract principles but which emerges through specific sites and social relationships producing the need for care (Gilligan, 1982;Held, 1993Held, , 1995Jagger, 1989Jagger, , 1991Jagger, , 1995Koehn, 1998;Lawson, 2007;Tronto, 1993). Nevertheless, this critical perspective still relies on a theoretical foundation that advocates care as a guiding ethical principal.…”