2020
DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caries Risk Assessment and Referral Tool (CRA‐RT)—A novel risk scoring system for early childhood caries in community settings

Abstract: Objective To develop a brief and simple, easy‐to‐administer, culturally sensitive, reliable and valid risk scoring system for early childhood caries based only on behavioural and other nonclinical risk factors. The purpose was to allow risk scoring by child care providers without clinical examination in order to guide dental referral in a community setting. Methods A cross‐sectional study using stratified multistage cluster sampling was conducted among 559 preschool children and their mothers in Anganwadi cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its use is intended for dental health care providers (50). While this project appears to be the first to report on the qualitative analysis of feedback acquired during the development of a CRA tool, other studies have expressed similar preferences and characteristics of an ideal CRA tool, such as the need for it to be quick to complete, easy to score, and to have clear cutoffs for risk levels to aid in the referral of high-risk patients to dental health care providers (38,42). The findings of this project are congruent with these preferences and should find to be useful for the development of CRA tools to come.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, its use is intended for dental health care providers (50). While this project appears to be the first to report on the qualitative analysis of feedback acquired during the development of a CRA tool, other studies have expressed similar preferences and characteristics of an ideal CRA tool, such as the need for it to be quick to complete, easy to score, and to have clear cutoffs for risk levels to aid in the referral of high-risk patients to dental health care providers (38,42). The findings of this project are congruent with these preferences and should find to be useful for the development of CRA tools to come.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the apps have to be informed by health professionals, with good design detail, grounded and validated for use, as the Canadian CRA tool has been (33,34). Although there have been numerous studies that have investigated caries risk factors and the predictive validity of CRA tools, this paper appears to be the first to report on the qualitative analysis of feedback acquired through pilot testing of a CRA tool indicated for use by non-dental primary health care providers (9,25,(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). A similar British study has reported on feedback from the pilot testing of an online integrated oral health and risk assessment tool (DEPPA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing cultural competence assessment scales had limited applications in the Indian setting due to the country's diversity of cultures and healing systems. Moreover, existing scales varied widely in their interpretation of “culture,” “cultural competence,” and therefore the assessments ( 15 ). Most of these tools were group-specific, focusing only on nurses, pharmacists, and dentists, thereby curtailing their application in the comprehensive assessment of cultural competence at the organization or national level ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other variables that have been associated with caries development during the life course through traditional statistical models could be easier to be assessed, such as socioeconomic, psychosocial, and behavioral patterns in early childhood (Peres et al 2009; Emmanuelli et al 2021). Therefore, the elaboration of simpler and easy-to-implement models with more accurate prediction could favor more rational use of health resources (Muraleedhar Seetha et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%