2022
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s389038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caries Management with Non-Metallic Nanomaterials: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background Non-metallic nanomaterials do not stain enamel or dentin. Most have better biocompatibility than metallic nanomaterials do for management of dental caries. Objective The objective of this study is to review the types, properties and potential uses of non-metallic nanomaterials systematically for managing dental caries. Methods Two researchers independently performed a literature search of publications in English using PubMed, Scopu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no consensus among researchers on how to effectively assess the quality of in vitro studies [ 107 ]. The methods used in our review to assess the risk of bias were adapted from a systematic review of in vitro studies [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus among researchers on how to effectively assess the quality of in vitro studies [ 107 ]. The methods used in our review to assess the risk of bias were adapted from a systematic review of in vitro studies [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles categorize and classify nanomaterials used in different disciplines of dentistry, mainly based on their shape, composition, and function [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Classifications Of Nanomaterials In Restorative Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another classification and definition system for nanomaterials is provided, principally by their structures into metallic and nonmetallic categories [9].…”
Section: Nanomaterials Based On Carbon Nanotubes (Cnts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two investigators independently assessed the risk of bias in individual studies. The evaluation was based on previous systematic reviews [4,14]. They assessed the quality of each study using seven parameters, which were: (1) presence of a control, (2) amount of material for assessment, (3) exposure time, (4) material characterization, (5) biocompatibility assessment, (6) blinding of observers and ( 7) sample size justification.…”
Section: Assessment Of Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%