2017
DOI: 10.25241/2017.4(1).4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caries Detection With Laser Fluorescence Devices. Limitations of Their Use

Abstract: Background: Dental caries is one of the most prevalent human diseases worldwide. The modern concept of minimal invasive dentistry includes early detection of incipient caries lesions and its treatment. Several optical and digital detection methods are available. Objective: This literature review presents the utility and limitations of laser fl uorescence caries detection devices DIAGNOdent (DD) and DIAGNOdent Pen (DDpen) (KaVo Dental GmbH, Biberach/ Riβ, Germany) for carious lesions on the occlusal surfaces of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous in vitro studies, which have evaluated the performance of LF for residual caries detection in primary teeth after different caries removal methods, it has been reported that the LF system could be effective in assessing caries removal by different methods. [1920] In our study, Group A showed [Table 1] 12 PCR positive and 10 culture positive (48% and 40%, respectively), Group B showed 12 PCR positive and 6 culture positive (48% and 24%, respectively), and Group C showed 7 PCR positive and 7 culture positive (28% and 28%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…In previous in vitro studies, which have evaluated the performance of LF for residual caries detection in primary teeth after different caries removal methods, it has been reported that the LF system could be effective in assessing caries removal by different methods. [1920] In our study, Group A showed [Table 1] 12 PCR positive and 10 culture positive (48% and 40%, respectively), Group B showed 12 PCR positive and 6 culture positive (48% and 24%, respectively), and Group C showed 7 PCR positive and 7 culture positive (28% and 28%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Unfortunately, there is not a single NCDT that fulfills all the desirable criteria for all clinicians to use them. However, the ease of use and short learning curve experienced by clinicians when using some of the new NCDTs, were reported in the literature as driving factors behind the continuous development of NCDTs [66][67][68].…”
Section: Main Indicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, visual inspection can be influenced by the subjective judgment of the inspector, and radiographic examination has limitations in accurately and precisely determining the extension of carious lesions [ 10 ]. Moreover, laser fluorescence devices are only effective in detecting occlusal caries and may detect the presence of stains and plaque during measurements, thereby reducing the specificity for detecting enamel lesions [ 11 ]. Therefore, the development of early and accurate detection method for the diagnosis of ECC is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%