Caries and Treatment Patterns in Children Related to School Lunch Program Eligibility

Abstract

This article presents the caries prevalence and treatment patterns of children relative to a classification of family economic status, based on the child's eligibility for the free or reduced-cost school lunch program. Dental caries prevalence is reported for children aged 8-11 years at the beginning of a longitudinal clinical trial in the nonfluoridated city of Tampa, Florida. These children were placed into one of three school lunch subsidy categories--poverty, near-poverty, and nonpoverty--using federal government income eligibility guidelines for the school lunch program. The results support an inverse relation of caries prevalence to economic status, as well as the expected direct relation of family income to treatment needs met. The nonpoverty group exhibited the lowest number of decayed surfaces and had nearly 70 percent of their treatment needs met. The poverty group had significantly higher scores both for total caries experience (DMFS) and decayed surfaces (DS) than either of the other groups. Filled surfaces (FS) scores were not significantly different for any of the groups. This method of classifying children by school lunch program eligibility is considered valid because of the rigorous requirements used in determining family income, as well as the thorough verification procedure that is applied. The method is easy to use once officials have been convinced that confidentiality will be maintained.

Office-Based Preventive Dental Program and Statewide Trends in Dental Caries

“…This finding is consistent with individual-level studies in which children from low-income families have more dental disease than children from families with higher incomes. [35][36][37] We found an increase of 3 percentage points in the effectiveness of the IMBP in high-risk schools compared with all schools. The larger effect of IMBP services in high-risk schools suggests that on average, children from low-income families are benefiting more from the IMBP than those from higher-income families.…”

The University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study I: Rationale and Content

“…Orthodontic Care: Limited evidence on children wearing orthodontic appliances shows that these children may experience smaller than average caries increments (84)(85). Although orthodontic care may be a proxy for higher SES status and the receipt of more intensive preventive care, it is felt that the relationship between the presence of orthodontic appliances and risk to caries should be assessed.…”

“…Microbiologic Predictors. The long search for specific causative microorganisms for dental caries has centered on Streptococcus inutans and lactobacilli (85)(86)(87)(88).…”

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Child Oral Health: A Comparison of Discrete and Composite Area‐Based Measures

“…Children with parents from lower socioeconomic groups are more likely to be born with low birth weight (4) and are more likely to suffer from childhood illnesses such as asthma (5). In relation to oral health, research in the 1960s showed that children from lower SES backgrounds actually had better dental health than children with higher SES (6). This was predominantly a result of differences in diet, with children from higher SES backgrounds having a more cariogenic diet.…”