2018
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201805005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cargo regulates clathrin-coated pit invagination via clathrin light chain phosphorylation

Abstract: Phosphorylation of clathrin light chains (CLCs) regulates GPCR uptake but is dispensable for transferrin internalization. Maib et al. show that CLCb phosphorylation is required for efficient auxilin-mediated clathrin exchange to promote coated pit invagination in a cargo-specific manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(127 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, essentially all known functions ascribed to clathrin light chains appear to be shared by both light chains and, where identified, involve identical sequences. These include modulation of in vitro clathrin lattice assembly and disassembly (Brodsky, 2012;Schmid et al, 1984;Ungewickell and Ungewickell, 1991), LRRK2 binding and Rac1 inactivation (Schreij et al, 2015), gyrating-clathrin (G-clathrin) formation and cargo recycling (Luo et al, 2013;Majeed et al, 2014;Parachoniak et al, 2011;Zhao and Keen, 2008, and this study), internalization of some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Ferreira et al, 2012;Maib et al, 2018) and Hip1-mediated actin interaction (Chen and Brodsky, 2005;Engqvist-Goldstein et al, 2001;Legendre-Guillemin et al, 2002;Legendre-Guillemin et al, 2005). Recently, a role for CLCb in the modulation of endocytic coated pit dynamics and EGFR processing has been identified (Chen et al, 2017b), and the importance of CLCa for internalization of some GPCRs has been inferred from immunological phenotypes in knockout mice (Wu et al, 2016), validating the concept of CLC-specific functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, essentially all known functions ascribed to clathrin light chains appear to be shared by both light chains and, where identified, involve identical sequences. These include modulation of in vitro clathrin lattice assembly and disassembly (Brodsky, 2012;Schmid et al, 1984;Ungewickell and Ungewickell, 1991), LRRK2 binding and Rac1 inactivation (Schreij et al, 2015), gyrating-clathrin (G-clathrin) formation and cargo recycling (Luo et al, 2013;Majeed et al, 2014;Parachoniak et al, 2011;Zhao and Keen, 2008, and this study), internalization of some G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Ferreira et al, 2012;Maib et al, 2018) and Hip1-mediated actin interaction (Chen and Brodsky, 2005;Engqvist-Goldstein et al, 2001;Legendre-Guillemin et al, 2002;Legendre-Guillemin et al, 2005). Recently, a role for CLCb in the modulation of endocytic coated pit dynamics and EGFR processing has been identified (Chen et al, 2017b), and the importance of CLCa for internalization of some GPCRs has been inferred from immunological phenotypes in knockout mice (Wu et al, 2016), validating the concept of CLC-specific functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Both P2Y 12 and μOR require phosphorylated clathrin light chain for efficient CME, whereas TfR does not. 80,81 B2AR endocytosis is blocked at 16 C while TfR endocytosis is not. 77 Segregation of different cargo into specific subsets of CCPs could allow individual control over clustering and endocytosis of different receptors.…”
Section: Segregation Of Gpcrs In Endocytic Domainsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…GPCRs also show different biochemical requirements for endocytosis. Both P2Y 12 and μOR require phosphorylated clathrin light chain for efficient CME, whereas TfR does not . B2AR endocytosis is blocked at 16°C while TfR endocytosis is not .…”
Section: Agonist‐mediated Receptor Endocytosismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Limited functional differences between CLCa and CLCb have been observed in cell culture with respect to clathrin dynamics 23 , during focal adhesion formation 24 and during cancer cell migration 25 , with mechanisms attributed to possible isoform-specific differences in CLC binding proteins and post-translational modification 26 . The capacity for biophysical differences in clathrin comprising different CLC isoforms and their splicing variants to influence tissue-specific clathrin functions has not yet been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, CLCs affect clathrin-mediated membrane deformation directly through their influence on clathrin lattice properties 30,34 and indirectly through their interaction with the force-generating actin machinery. Loss of CLCs in culture and in vivo affects CCV uptake of some, but not all cargo, possibly reflecting variability in mechanical demand for packaging different cargo into CCVs 10,26,35 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%