2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Careworkers don't have a voice:” Epistemological violence in residential care for older people

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This emphasis is highlighted in the ever increasing (and some would argue constricting) number of regulations developed for the long-term, residential care industry. Banerjee and colleagues ( 63 ) asserted that, “these regulations, and the reporting they require, take valuable time away from care, often fail to account for the relational aspects of care, and disempower residents while empowering paperwork (p. 7). The focus on safety in these regulations may lead to the disempowerment of persons with dementia by limiting their choices, removing their control, and ensuring that the dignity of risk is not extended to persons with dementia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This emphasis is highlighted in the ever increasing (and some would argue constricting) number of regulations developed for the long-term, residential care industry. Banerjee and colleagues ( 63 ) asserted that, “these regulations, and the reporting they require, take valuable time away from care, often fail to account for the relational aspects of care, and disempower residents while empowering paperwork (p. 7). The focus on safety in these regulations may lead to the disempowerment of persons with dementia by limiting their choices, removing their control, and ensuring that the dignity of risk is not extended to persons with dementia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…time, human resources, or money), stress is likely to occur ( Veer et al, 2013 ). This underlines a counter-effect of skill development within an untenable system and reveals how the reductionist organization of care work conflicts with the needs of relational care ( Banerjee et al, 2015 ). The statement, ‘we just can’t do it right’ reflects the perceived powerlessness of care workers being exposed to ‘a greedy organization’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The apparent conflict between perceiving the program as very valuable and being reluctant to accommodate it mirrors other results suggesting that the low resource base and task-oriented nature of work in Canadian LTC settings competes directly with health providers' interests in forging stronger relationships with the residents (41,42). On one hand, Namaste Care is a solution to this problem, since it is promoted as a way to improve care without necessarily increasing staffing, and since it provides a means of systematizing resident-centred care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%