2020
DOI: 10.1177/0269216320917875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregiving at the margins: An ethnographic exploration of family caregivers experiences providing care for structurally vulnerable populations at the end-of-life

Abstract: Background: People experiencing structural vulnerability (e.g. homelessness, poverty, racism, criminalization of illicit drug use and mental health stigma) face significant barriers to accessing care at the end-of-life. ‘Family’ caregivers have the potential to play critical roles in providing care to these populations, yet little is known regarding ‘who’ caregivers are in this context and what their experiences may be. Aim: Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it turns out, safety should not be merely understood as a function of professional healthcare but rather as a multifactorial product. Available conceptualizations in relevant literature suggest 4 elements of patient safety: 7,32 -34 the individual patient, formal care, informal care, and external factors (see Figure 5). This perspective on the one hand assigns patients themselves responsibility for their own safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it turns out, safety should not be merely understood as a function of professional healthcare but rather as a multifactorial product. Available conceptualizations in relevant literature suggest 4 elements of patient safety: 7,32 -34 the individual patient, formal care, informal care, and external factors (see Figure 5). This perspective on the one hand assigns patients themselves responsibility for their own safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain social locations related to age, literacy, language and pre-existing poverty appeared to be more likely to be associated with difficulties navigating welfare systems; potentially at greater risk of disadvantage. At end-of-life, poor outcomes related to complex care systems for the structurally vulnerable 5,19 and considerable inequity in financial support 11 have been identified. Palliative care clinicians must therefore perceive social needs related to income support and housing as an ‘essential component(s) of palliative care’ 5 and develop current social policy literacy to support timely access to assistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Welfare systems constitute structural determinants of carer experience that may perpetuate disadvantage, or 'institutional inequity'. 16 Patients and carers positioned as 'structurally vulnerable', due to intersecting social and structural forces that constrain decision-making, frame choices, and limit life options, 16,17 may be exposed to experiences of layered disadvantages at end-of-life, 18,19 and in bereavement. 20 Further exploration of structural conditions such as welfare policy and public organisations is warranted, 15 specifically in relation to vulnerably positioned carers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further support comes from literature on carers of people with long-term conditions suggesting that managing relationships is an important, yet challenging, aspect of caring in which carers are rarely supported. 22 24 The data also incidentally suggested relevance of this domain to carers of patients with cognitive impairments: at one group two carers discussed how patients’ comorbid dementia led to patient-carer relationship difficulties. The impact of dementia on relationships is well documented, with subsequent impact on carers’ physical and mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%