2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregiver person-centeredness and behavioral symptoms during mealtime interactions: Development and feasibility of a coding scheme

Abstract: Mealtime behavioral symptoms are distressing and frequently interrupt eating for the individual experiencing them and others in the environment. In order to enable identification of potential antecedents to mealtime behavioral symptoms, a computer-assisted coding scheme was developed to measure caregiver person-centeredness and behavioral symptoms for nursing home residents with dementia during mealtime interactions. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of procedur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible reasons for this include that CNAs may overestimate a resident's ability to manage meals independently and/or they may have competing demands during mealtimes that don't allow for spending adequate time with individual residents to ensure meals are completed. 31 Another potential explanation could be a lack of understanding for how to manage feeding behaviors such as not opening the mouth or turning the head way. 29,32 The majority of residents in this secondary analysis that required feeding assistance were residents with dementia (59.92%); feeding behaviors are often interpreted by CNAs as care resistance and feeding attempts cease or persistence just exceeds available time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible reasons for this include that CNAs may overestimate a resident's ability to manage meals independently and/or they may have competing demands during mealtimes that don't allow for spending adequate time with individual residents to ensure meals are completed. 31 Another potential explanation could be a lack of understanding for how to manage feeding behaviors such as not opening the mouth or turning the head way. 29,32 The majority of residents in this secondary analysis that required feeding assistance were residents with dementia (59.92%); feeding behaviors are often interpreted by CNAs as care resistance and feeding attempts cease or persistence just exceeds available time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data obtained from this type of scoring, rather than second‐by‐second behavioural coding, does not allow sequential analysis to examine temporal relationships between behaviours and intake. Only a few tools are developed for videotaped observations, including Feeding Traceline Technique that captures limited dyadic behaviours in the intake process (Phillips & Van Ort, 1993) and the behavioural coding scheme for caregiver person‐centredness and resident agitation during mealtime that does not capture resident verbal behaviours and positive/neutral nonverbal behaviours (Gilmore‐Bykovskyi, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1989, Gilmore‐Bykovskyi 2015). Examples of mealtime agitation can be shouting or screaming, asking questions constantly, being aggressive, resisting eating, being restless, or wandering, including leaving the table before the meal is finished (Cohen‐Mansfield et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of mealtime agitation can be shouting or screaming, asking questions constantly, being aggressive, resisting eating, being restless, or wandering, including leaving the table before the meal is finished (Cohen‐Mansfield et al . 1989, Denney 1997, Gilmore‐Bykovskyi 2015). Not understanding the ‘meal situation’ or not understanding the help offered by staff can result in various types of agitated behaviours during mealtime (Aselage & Amella 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation