2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregiver burden?A critical discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
276
3
17

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
10
276
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of the literature focuses only on a subset of these categories of constructs, and the measurement of these constructs is often limited to only a few of these variables. It has been proven that combining the SPM with other provides a conceptual clarity [21] for modelling caregiving burden. In this study the combination of SPM and TMSC was ustilised to enable intuitive understanding of the stress process.…”
Section: Stress Process Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of the literature focuses only on a subset of these categories of constructs, and the measurement of these constructs is often limited to only a few of these variables. It has been proven that combining the SPM with other provides a conceptual clarity [21] for modelling caregiving burden. In this study the combination of SPM and TMSC was ustilised to enable intuitive understanding of the stress process.…”
Section: Stress Process Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where prevailing notions assume that caregiver stress and burden are the results of providing PwDs with functional assistance (critiqued by Roth et al, 2015) and managing PwDs’ “behaviours” (critiqued by Dupuis, Wiersma, & Loiselle, 2012b), our study asserts an alternative explanation that stresses the consequences of limited family support and inadequate home and institutional care supports. Others have similarly charged the dominant construction of burden as imprecisely understanding the sources of stress (Roth et al, 2015) and burden (Bastawrous, 2013), and neglecting important structural factors that produce negative consequences for family care partners (Lilly et al, 2011; Singh et al, 2014; Ward-Griffin et al, 2012). While the mismatched logics between informal and formal care systems (Singh et al, 2014) and diminishing formal care support (Ward-Griffin et al, 2012) have been documented, our study adds two novel insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the tools used had psychometric properties or were in the process of being validated, in some cases insufficiently detailed descriptive statistics were presented. In addition, quantitative measures are largely used to capture caregiver burden, which can be inadequate in identifying certain factors that are important such as culture (Bastawrous, 2013). Only two of the studies adopted a longitudinal design and some studies recognised spouses and partners as one category whilst others did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%