Abstract:This article examined the role of caregiver messages about violence and exposure to neighborhood violence on adolescent aggression in light of research regarding discrepancies between parents and their children. Drawing upon data from an urban African American sample of 144 caregiver/early adolescent dyads (M = 12.99; SD = 0.93; 58.7% female) we examined covariates of discrepancies between caregiver and adolescent reports of perceptions of violence as well as their association with adolescent aggression. Analy… Show more
“…Four other articles reported findings for U.S. ethnic minority samples, with two of the studies involving African-American families (Johnson et al 2016;Skinner and McHale 2016) and two involving Hispanic families (Córdova et al 2016;Valdes et al 2016). The rest of the 13 empirical reports (excluding the Korelitz and Garber (2016) meta-analysis and the De Los Reyes and Ohannessian (2016) Introduction) used mixed community samples, with European-American/ Caucasian families comprising from 40 % of the sample (Jager et al 2016) to 81 % (Metzger et al 2016).…”
Section: Cross-cultural Aspects Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These families were therefore rather atypical of African-American families in general, given that [70 % of African-American children are born to single mothers and about 30 % of African-American families live in poverty. The Johnson et al (2016) study reflects this more typical demographic, given that their 144 families were recruited from urban middle schools in neighborhoods known for high levels of violence, 73 % of the caregivers were mothers and 6 % were fathers, and 60 % of the parents reported high school education or less.…”
As summarized in this commentary, the first generation of cross-informant agreement research focused on perceptions of child and adolescent mental health. Contributions of this research include demonstrating that modest cross-informant agreement is a very robust phenomenon, utilizing numerous statistical approaches to measure degree of agreement, and identifying many factors that moderate agreement.
“…Four other articles reported findings for U.S. ethnic minority samples, with two of the studies involving African-American families (Johnson et al 2016;Skinner and McHale 2016) and two involving Hispanic families (Córdova et al 2016;Valdes et al 2016). The rest of the 13 empirical reports (excluding the Korelitz and Garber (2016) meta-analysis and the De Los Reyes and Ohannessian (2016) Introduction) used mixed community samples, with European-American/ Caucasian families comprising from 40 % of the sample (Jager et al 2016) to 81 % (Metzger et al 2016).…”
Section: Cross-cultural Aspects Of the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These families were therefore rather atypical of African-American families in general, given that [70 % of African-American children are born to single mothers and about 30 % of African-American families live in poverty. The Johnson et al (2016) study reflects this more typical demographic, given that their 144 families were recruited from urban middle schools in neighborhoods known for high levels of violence, 73 % of the caregivers were mothers and 6 % were fathers, and 60 % of the parents reported high school education or less.…”
As summarized in this commentary, the first generation of cross-informant agreement research focused on perceptions of child and adolescent mental health. Contributions of this research include demonstrating that modest cross-informant agreement is a very robust phenomenon, utilizing numerous statistical approaches to measure degree of agreement, and identifying many factors that moderate agreement.
“…According to the classic epidemiologic “triad” model, diseases are cultivated through the interplay of an external agent , a vulnerable host , and an environment/location that brings the host and agent together (Dicker et al, 2006). Illuminating the highly macrosocial nature of violence, research suggests that most adolescent violence—that is, violence between an external agent (primary antagonist) and a secondary antagonist (a perpetrator who is perhaps less eager than the external agent to commit violence but nevertheless does, or a victim who is unwilling to commit violence, even when physically attacked)—occurs on school grounds (Basile et al, 2020; James et al, 2020; Lindstrom Johnson et al, 2016). Here, school grounds, as the site of violence’s manifestation, would be operationalized as a disease environment .…”
Section: Reconsidering the “Violence-as-a-disease” Modelmentioning
Objective: Owing to its immense scope and persistence in impacting health, there have been increasing, but undertheorized, calls to conceptualize and address violence as a public health issue. This violence-as-a-disease paradigm has particular relevance in consideration of the deep sociomedical embeddedness of violence in minoritized communities. Given that violent ideation and actualized violence begin early in one’s life, consideration of adolescent violence in these theoretical contexts is of particular utility. Method: We conducted semistructured interviews with 32 school staff members, including, school teachers, administrators, and security, at five high-risk urban public high schools in the Chicago metropolitan area. Most participants were either Black (31.3%), White (43.8%), or Hispanic (21.9%). We examined perspectives on the causes and consequences of adolescent violence, tested and reconceptualized the violence-as-a-disease model, and developed an enhanced nomenclature for this model. Abductive analysis was used to analyze the interviews. Results: Respondents identified specific co-occurring “chronic” and “acute” causes for violence, with psychosocial cognates being central to violence initiation. Chronic causes include structural forces such as neighborhood deprivation, limited resource access, and familial and cultural influences. Acute causes include situational and “real-time” triggers like perceived slights and a desire to meet social group performance expectations. Conclusions: In consideration of the violence-as-a-disease paradigm, violence is stimulated and entrenched by socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental forces that implicate psychopathological paradigms in multiple groups and individual-level contexts. An expanded nomenclature and conceptual model for primary and secondary prevention are proposed.
“…Additionally, adolescents who hold high divergent perceptions of such parental or adolescent behaviors likely perceive parents as failing to grant them enough autonomy and independence or emotionally unsupportive. Moreover, parent–adolescent convergence and divergence are linked to adolescent adjustments (e.g., positive and negative affect) and family functions (e.g., mother–child conflict), indicating the necessity to integrate a multi‐informant approach to better understand the processes of family dynamics and adolescent development (De Los Reyes & Ohannessian, 2016; Janssen et al, 2021; Lindstrom Johnson et al, 2016). Parent–adolescent convergent and divergent perceptions of parental psychological control may have different implications for different perceptions of adolescent emotional problems, but to the best of our knowledge, researchers have yet to examine these associations.…”
Using month‐long daily diary data collected between 2019 and 2020 among 99 dyads of Canadian parents (58.6% White, Mage = 43.5, 69.7% female) and adolescents (51.5% White, Mage = 14.6, 53.5% female) from middle to high socioeconomic status families, this study investigated parents' and adolescents' daily shared and unique perceptions of parental psychological control and adolescent emotional problems at within‐ and between‐family level, and examined their cross‐day associations. Multilevel multi‐trait multi‐method confirmatory factor analysis revealed both convergence and divergence across parent–adolescent perceptions at the within level, but no convergence at the between level. Dynamic structural equation modeling revealed cross‐day associations across different perspectives of parenting and adolescent behaviors. Findings contribute novel knowledge to understanding parent–child daily interactions with a multi‐informant approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.