Refiguring Techniques in Digital Visual Research 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Careful Surveillance at Play: Human-Animal Relations and Mobile Media in the Home

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Adelman (2017) asserts, however, highly promoted datafication and dataveillance technologies often have many glitches, and fail to achieve the grandiose insights into humans that their promoters promise. There is little recognition in these critical perspectives that people may benefit themselves from such practices, including engaging with digitised information to learn more about themselves and achieve better health, well-being and a feeling of control over their lives (Lupton, 2018, 2019, 2020a), or to care for and support others’ well-being (Hjorth and Lupton, forthcoming; Richardson et al, 2017). In-depth research has demonstrated that rather than passively accepting the affordances offered by technologies for digitising and processing personal information, many people work to create, repair and reinvent their data as they incorporate this information into their everyday routines (Pink et al, 2017; Pink et al, 2018; Lupton, 2018, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Adelman (2017) asserts, however, highly promoted datafication and dataveillance technologies often have many glitches, and fail to achieve the grandiose insights into humans that their promoters promise. There is little recognition in these critical perspectives that people may benefit themselves from such practices, including engaging with digitised information to learn more about themselves and achieve better health, well-being and a feeling of control over their lives (Lupton, 2018, 2019, 2020a), or to care for and support others’ well-being (Hjorth and Lupton, forthcoming; Richardson et al, 2017). In-depth research has demonstrated that rather than passively accepting the affordances offered by technologies for digitising and processing personal information, many people work to create, repair and reinvent their data as they incorporate this information into their everyday routines (Pink et al, 2017; Pink et al, 2018; Lupton, 2018, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has designed interactions to enrich farm animals' physical and mental well-being [28], as well as adapted existing digital technology for captive zoo animals to increase public engagement and understanding [113] by allowing zoo visitors to observe animals interacting with technology familiar to them. Extensive work has also been done on the design of digital technology for working animals [6,43], and the adaption of existing digital technology and algorithms to increase the relationship between humans and their pets [53,58,78,81]. As a result, research on animal-centered technology has built an extensive understanding of how technology might serve animals and the people they interact with.…”
Section: Background and Motivation-the Need For An Information Systems Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this special issue we begin with articles that explore the role of technology around informal and public health discourses , focusing on the role of care as a guiding practice and set of ethical frameworks. The first article, by Andrejevic et al, explores ‘careful surveillance’ – ‘a term that acknowledges the often conflicted and paradoxical relation between caring, watching, guardianship and control’ (Richardson et al, 2017). The authors argue that the relationality between ‘modalities of care and the formal and informal surveillance strategies’ are being transformed by ‘perceptions, practices and attitudes around care-based monitoring, shaped by individual beliefs and attitudes, collective mores and habitudes, and epidemiological and public health knowledges’ during the pandemic.…”
Section: Informal Care and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%