2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Careful Selection and Close Monitoring of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance Minimizes the Need for Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
187
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
187
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…An RCT comparing RP with observation detected no significant difference between groups for prostate-cancer mortality rate and all-cause mortality rate after 12 years, 20 and the two most commonly reported adverse events associated with active surveillance (urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) [19][20][21][22] are similarly reported in other studies of immediate active treatments. [23][24] Therefore AS does not present any new or different harm.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An RCT comparing RP with observation detected no significant difference between groups for prostate-cancer mortality rate and all-cause mortality rate after 12 years, 20 and the two most commonly reported adverse events associated with active surveillance (urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction) [19][20][21][22] are similarly reported in other studies of immediate active treatments. [23][24] Therefore AS does not present any new or different harm.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][12][13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22]29,32,33 The studies reporting their active surveillance protocol conducted multicore (6-to 17-core) biopsies every 1 to 2 years. 5,10,12,[15][16][17][18]21,23,[28][29][30][33][34][35] Five studies conducted multicore biopsies every 2 to 4 years. 8,11,13,19,32 Regarding Multiparametric MRI, it has been shown to be a good predictor of disease reclassification.…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for AS set forth from published series are shown in Table 1 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. First described in 1994, and then updated in 2004, the Epstein criteria integrate biopsy criteria with clinical data to identify potentially low-risk tumors and are among the most commonly used methods to identify lowrisk disease [16,17].…”
Section: Criteria For Active Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction is particularly important in that neither oncologic, nor quality of life, outcomes from patients assigned to observation in older randomized trials, [8,14], nor those identified in population-based registries as receiving conservative management, can be considered representative of those expected with contemporary active surveillance. Table 1 summarizes the published prospective experience with active surveillance, comprising more than 2900 patients [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. These studies differ in terms of their eligibility and triggers for intervention.…”
Section: Active Surveillance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%