This article tests a model of turnover intention on a large sample of Texas state employees focusing on four issues. First, the findings support a life cycle stability hypothesis, which suggests that age, experience, and geographic preferences reduce turnover intention, an effect compounded by economic/familial constraints for primary wage earners and members of large households. Second, contrary to previous research, the results show that females are significantly less likely to state an intention to quit. This finding reflects changing patterns of labor force participation, as well as the particular advantages that the public sector offers female employees. Third, the results distinguish between the relative contributions of three overlapping concepts: organizational loyalty, voice, and empowerment. Organizational loyalty and empowerment reduce turnover intention, but voice is not a significant factor. Finally, the article provides a detailed test of different personnel policies, providing particular support for diversity policies. W hy do public employees decide to leave their organization? This is a basic question for human resource managers and organization theorists. Organizations use expensive human resource management (HRM) strategies not only in the hope of recruiting staff, but also of keeping them. The underlying bias of turnover research is that voluntary turnover is a negative outcome for an organization. When an organization loses the human capital it wants to retain, it incurs process separation costs, recruitment costs, training costs, and lost productivity costs. Research has sought to understand why employees leave, with the hope of providing employers with an informed understanding of the strategies they can use to limit turnover. This article has two particular goals. First, we identify and test a detailed model of turnover based on previous research. Although there is an extensive empirical literature on turnover in the private sector, there is surprisingly little in the public sector.