Career Adaptability in Serbia: Examining the CAAS model

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of a Serbian translation of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS ? Serbian Form). Two different studies involving Serbian employed adults were conducted. In the first study (n = 374), the results of confirmatory factor analyses supported the four-factor structure of the scale and it is shown that the overall CAAS score and sub-dimension scores were highly reliable. The second study (n = 270) demonstrated the external validity of the instrument. Correlations with narcissism, career satisfaction, supervisory support, perceived social support, and burnout were consistent with the theoretical expectations and results of previous studies, suggesting good external validity of the instrument. The configural, metric, scalar, and residual measurement invariance of the CAAS ? Serbian Form among two samples were established. It was concluded that the CAAS ? Serbian Form has adequate psychometric properties, and hence could be considered as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring career adaptability of employed adults. [Project of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Grant no. 179002]

Decision‐Making Styles, Career Decision Self‐Efficacy, and Career Adaptability Among High School Students

“…To assess career adaptability, we used the validated Serbian form (Mirkovic´ et al, 2020) of the 24-item Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-International (CAAS-2.0; Savickas & Porfeli, 2012). The original structure of the scale has been confirmed in the Serbian validation study, and all scales are shown to be reliable, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from .82 to .92 for the total score (Mirkovic´ et al, 2020). Respondents rate how strongly they have developed each of the specified career-related competencies, and composite scores are calculated by averaging the responses to all items.…”