Abstract:Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS) was recently reduced to a briefer 12-items version, the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Short Form (CAAS-SF). Considering its advantages in long protocols, we validated CAAS-SF for the Portuguese context. Participants were 314 university students (17–47 years old, Mage = 21.50, SDage = 4.32, 82.8% females), and 899 working adults (17–66 years old, Mage = 40.14, SDage = 11.95, 76.8% females). Sociodemographic, career adaptability, vocational identity, and life satisfaction measu… Show more
“…It comprises three items per dimension, totaling 12 items. The CAAS-SF has been validated in various nations, including not only European (Soares et al, 2022) but also Asian countries (Yu et al, 2020). Although the CAAS-SF is only half the length of the original, it retains the same factor structure and similar psychometric properties to the full version (Yu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Career Adaptability and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study provides a psychometrically and contently valid super-short scale, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. First, scales of career adaptability are often used for two populations: undergraduates and working employees to evaluate their ability to adapt in career environment (Hou et al, 2012; Savickas & Porfeli, 2012; Soares et al, 2022; Yu et al, 2020). Yet this study only collected data from the working adults to validate the CAAS-SSF.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS), which consists of 24 items, was collaboratively constructed by scholars from different countries and proved to achieve satisfactory reliability and validity across various cultural settings (Hou et al, 2012; Savickas & Porfeli, 2012). To easier integrate career adaptability with other constructs into surveys and facilitate career counseling, Maggiori et al (2017) shortened the CAAS, forming a briefer version with 12 items, which has been validated in various cultural samples (Soares et al, 2022; Yu et al, 2020).…”
To facilitate future research on career adaptability, this study aims to validate the super-short form of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS-SSF) through two studies across three samples. In Study 1, the full scale is shortened to a 4-item scale based on a Chinese sample (Sample 1, N = 616), considering both reliability and validity. Study 2 aims to validate the 4-item CAAS-SSF across two additional samples: Sample 2 in China ( N = 332) and Sample 3 in the United Kingdom ( N = 317). Results show that the CAAS-SSF demonstrates satisfactory reliability and good fit with the unidimensional model of career adaptability. Furthermore, the super-short scale exhibits acceptable measurement invariance across gender and culture groups. Moreover, criterion-related validity of the CAAS-SSF is supported by its positive correlations with criterions (i.e., job performance, career satisfaction, and occupational self-efficacy) that parallel results of the CAAS and CAAS-Short Form. Overall, the findings support the CAAS-SSF as a reliable and valid representation of the 24-item CAAS. Limitations and directions for future research are also discussed.
“…It comprises three items per dimension, totaling 12 items. The CAAS-SF has been validated in various nations, including not only European (Soares et al, 2022) but also Asian countries (Yu et al, 2020). Although the CAAS-SF is only half the length of the original, it retains the same factor structure and similar psychometric properties to the full version (Yu et al, 2020).…”
Section: Career Adaptability and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study provides a psychometrically and contently valid super-short scale, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. First, scales of career adaptability are often used for two populations: undergraduates and working employees to evaluate their ability to adapt in career environment (Hou et al, 2012; Savickas & Porfeli, 2012; Soares et al, 2022; Yu et al, 2020). Yet this study only collected data from the working adults to validate the CAAS-SSF.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS), which consists of 24 items, was collaboratively constructed by scholars from different countries and proved to achieve satisfactory reliability and validity across various cultural settings (Hou et al, 2012; Savickas & Porfeli, 2012). To easier integrate career adaptability with other constructs into surveys and facilitate career counseling, Maggiori et al (2017) shortened the CAAS, forming a briefer version with 12 items, which has been validated in various cultural samples (Soares et al, 2022; Yu et al, 2020).…”
To facilitate future research on career adaptability, this study aims to validate the super-short form of the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS-SSF) through two studies across three samples. In Study 1, the full scale is shortened to a 4-item scale based on a Chinese sample (Sample 1, N = 616), considering both reliability and validity. Study 2 aims to validate the 4-item CAAS-SSF across two additional samples: Sample 2 in China ( N = 332) and Sample 3 in the United Kingdom ( N = 317). Results show that the CAAS-SSF demonstrates satisfactory reliability and good fit with the unidimensional model of career adaptability. Furthermore, the super-short scale exhibits acceptable measurement invariance across gender and culture groups. Moreover, criterion-related validity of the CAAS-SSF is supported by its positive correlations with criterions (i.e., job performance, career satisfaction, and occupational self-efficacy) that parallel results of the CAAS and CAAS-Short Form. Overall, the findings support the CAAS-SSF as a reliable and valid representation of the 24-item CAAS. Limitations and directions for future research are also discussed.
“…The career guidance process also provides an understanding of work adaptation because change and displacement are inevitable for every individual, even if only slightly. Adjustments to rules, policies, health issues, new people and environments (Soares et al, 2023). Adaptation outcomes are important, and career adaptability is a crucial resource for achieving positive adaptation outcomes (Parola & Marcionetti, 2021).…”
The career development tasks of urban and rural Muslim students tend to experience obstacles, especially when they are in the final semester of college. This situation and condition needs to be addressed responsively by educators and managers of career development centers in every Islamic university in particular. Various approaches have been taken in an effort to facilitate student career development, but the limited content of career guidance has not maximized religious and cultural values systematically and comprehensively. The purpose of this study is to describe the career guidance model and examine cultural values and religion in several PTKI in the Sumatra region. The method in this research uses a qualitative approach and is analyzed using descriptive methods and content analysis. The process of collecting data through interviews and analyzing data triangulation by comparing some field findings to expert informants. The results of this study found several religious and cultural values that can be used as content or discussion themes in the career guidance process. The results of this study found that religious values related to career or one's success are listed in QS Al-Ahzab: 70, At-Taubah: 105, An-Nahl: 78, HR. Ahmad Ibnu Abid Dunya, Ath-Thabrani, & Al-Baihaqi, HR Tirmidzi and Al- Hakim. Some cultural values that can be the content of career guidance are related to the values of honesty, enthusiasm for learning, hard work, adaptation, and understanding of human weaknesses and strengths.
“…The quality of adaptability is reflected in a person's readiness to face various changes related to the conditions he faces [26]. This ability has been proven to play a major role in senior female workers in building and maintaining relationships in the workplace [27]. Even other research states that career adaptability has become a major resource for adolescents, adults and elderly workers when facing a period of transition.…”
Section: Measurement Of Research Variablesmentioning
This research involves all students of Generation Z who study in West Kalimantan as a population. The questionnaire was designed in google-form and distributed using snowball sampling technique through WhatsApp, Telegram and Line social media, resulting in 6,721 responses. The selection process from the total responses decided 5,178 respondents were eligible and fit the research targets, while 1,543 others were dropped because some were studying outside West Kalimantan and some were still in high school. The age of the respondents spread from 19 to d. 23 years old and by gender, 1,890 of them were male and 3,288 were female. The campuses where they study are spread out at Tanjungpura University, Widya Dharma University, IKIP PGRI, Polnep, Panca Bhakti University, Kapuas Sintang University, Muhamadyah University and other campuses in West Kalimantan.
The collected data was processed using WarpPls version 6. The results of data processing and testing stated that all research hypotheses were acceptable. Acceptance of the hypothesis is the basis for researchers to draw conclusions that emotional intelligence variables and career adaptability variables are positive and significant shapers for achievement motivation, emotional intelligence variables are positive and significant shapers for career adaptability, career adaptability variables are a partial mediation in the relationship between emotional intelligence and achievement motivation in generation Z students in West Kalimantan when facing face-to-face lectures after the COVID-19 pandemic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.