Abstract:This study was designed to describe the care-planning process used in nursing homes and identify links among care planning, care provided, and the Resident Assessment Instrument and Minimum Data Set (MDS). Study participants in three Midwestern nursing homes included residents and family members, MDS coordinators, direct care staff, administrators, directors of nursing, and medical directors. Data were collected via semi-structured interview, observation, and resident record audit. The care-planning process di… Show more
“…Despite excellent intentions by the facility's staff and its board of directors, care planning for the end of life was not systematic or consistent. Our experience is consistent with the literature [14][15][16] and reflects a major barrier to the success of any QI initiative for end-of-life care in a nursing home.…”
The purpose of this column is to discuss innovations and quality improvement efforts in a variety of long-term care settings. These issues are of importance to healthcare professionals as our nation faces the burgeoning growth of the aging population, creating increased demand for improved and innovative long-term care services. This column is coordinated by Marilyn J. Rantz, PhD, RN, FAAN, NHA,
“…Despite excellent intentions by the facility's staff and its board of directors, care planning for the end of life was not systematic or consistent. Our experience is consistent with the literature [14][15][16] and reflects a major barrier to the success of any QI initiative for end-of-life care in a nursing home.…”
The purpose of this column is to discuss innovations and quality improvement efforts in a variety of long-term care settings. These issues are of importance to healthcare professionals as our nation faces the burgeoning growth of the aging population, creating increased demand for improved and innovative long-term care services. This column is coordinated by Marilyn J. Rantz, PhD, RN, FAAN, NHA,
“…5 In terms of care provision, a similar caveat related to charts is indicated: Staff provide care based more on residents' needs than on what is written on their charts. 5,16 The most important issue relating to care for people with dementia is the extent to which their care needs are being met. The cross-sectional design of the NSRCF cannot address that point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Scores range from 0 to 10. Zero is no cognitive impairment (for purposes of comparison, the comparable Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] scores are greater than 23), 1-2 is mild impairment (MMSE, 19-23), 3-5 is moderate impairment (MMSE,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), and 6-10 is severe impairment (MMSE, less than 12).…”
Assisted living residences have become prominent sites of longterm residential care for older adults with dementia. Estimates derived from national data indicate that seven out of ten residents in these residences have some form of cognitive impairment, with 29 percent having mild impairment, 23 percent moderate impairment, and 19 percent severe impairment. More than one-third of residents display behavioral symptoms, and of these, 57 percent have a medication prescribed for their symptoms. Only a minority of cognitively impaired residents reside in a dementia special care unit, where admission and discharge policies are more supportive of their needs. Policy-relevant recommendations from our study include the need to examine the use of psychotropic medications and cultures related to prescribing, better train assisted living staff to handle medications and provide nonpharmacological treatments, use best practices in caring for people with dementia, and promote consumer education regarding policies and practices in assisted living.
“…Research suggests that care plans do not guide daily care in nursing homes (Dellefield, 2006; Schnelle, Bates-Jensen, Chu, & Simmons, 2004). Instead, features of daily care are greatly dependent on the activities of unlicensed personal support workers (PSWs) (Bowers, Esmond, & Jacobson, 2000; Taunton, Swagerty, Smith, Lasseter, & Lee, 2004), who provide 80%–90% of all direct care in nursing homes (Caspar & O’Rourke, 2008). …”
Purpose: The Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Data Set (RAI/MDS) is an interdisciplinary standardized process that informs care plan development in nursing homes. This standardized process has failed to consistently result in individualized care planning, which may suggest problems with content and planning integrity. We examined the decision making and care practices of personal support workers (PSWs) in relation to the RAI/MDS standardized process. Design and Methods: This qualitative study utilized focus groups and semi-structured interviews with PSWs (n = 26) and supervisors (n = 9) in two nursing homes in central Canada. Results: PSWs evidenced unique occupational contributions to assessment via proximal familiarity and biographical information as well as to individualizing care by empathetically linking their own bodily experiences and forging bonds of fictive kinship with residents. These contributions were neither captured by RAI/MDS categories nor relayed to the interdisciplinary team. Causal factors for PSW exclusion included computerized records, low status, and poor interprofessional collaboration. Intraprofessional collaboration by PSWs aimed to compensate for exclusion and to individualize care. Implications: Exclusive institutional reliance on the RAI/MDS undermines quality care because it fails to capture residents’ preferences and excludes input by PSWs. Recommendations include incorporating PSW knowledge in care planning and documentation and examining PSWs’ nascent occupational identity and their role as interprofessional brokers in long-term care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.