2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Care HPS: A high performance simulation tool for parallel and distributed agent-based modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Toolkits such as D-MASON (Cordasco et al, 2014) initially attempted to avoid the complexity of MPI (at least in the Java environment) in distributing and coordinating agents across processes in favor of sockets and the Java Message Service before turning to MPI as a more performant solution for interprocess communication. Other ABM toolkits such as Pandora (Rubio-Campillo 2014), Care HPS (Borges et al, 2017), and Repast HPC (Collier and North 2013) also use MPI as the message-passing layer, while Flame GPU (Richmond and Chimeh 2017) distributes agents across a GPU such that their behavior can be executed in parallel. Other areas of emphasis are strategies for load balancing and the optimal partitioning of agents using different topologies and ghosting techniques (Borges et al, 2017;Collier et al, 2015).…”
Section: Agent-based Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Toolkits such as D-MASON (Cordasco et al, 2014) initially attempted to avoid the complexity of MPI (at least in the Java environment) in distributing and coordinating agents across processes in favor of sockets and the Java Message Service before turning to MPI as a more performant solution for interprocess communication. Other ABM toolkits such as Pandora (Rubio-Campillo 2014), Care HPS (Borges et al, 2017), and Repast HPC (Collier and North 2013) also use MPI as the message-passing layer, while Flame GPU (Richmond and Chimeh 2017) distributes agents across a GPU such that their behavior can be executed in parallel. Other areas of emphasis are strategies for load balancing and the optimal partitioning of agents using different topologies and ghosting techniques (Borges et al, 2017;Collier et al, 2015).…”
Section: Agent-based Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other ABM toolkits such as Pandora (Rubio-Campillo 2014), Care HPS (Borges et al, 2017), and Repast HPC (Collier and North 2013) also use MPI as the message-passing layer, while Flame GPU (Richmond and Chimeh 2017) distributes agents across a GPU such that their behavior can be executed in parallel. Other areas of emphasis are strategies for load balancing and the optimal partitioning of agents using different topologies and ghosting techniques (Borges et al, 2017;Collier et al, 2015).…”
Section: Agent-based Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line of research, the Care HPS (i.e. from high performance simulation) tool [8] supports agent-based modeling with parallel computing for increasing the performance of the simulations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several frameworks for generating parallel ABMS simulators have been developed taking advantage of the common characteristics of these applications. Among them, we can mention FLAME [3], FLAME GPU [4], Repast HPC [5], EcoLab [6], D-MASON [7], Pandora [8] or Care-HPS [9]. They present differences in the way agents and contexts are specified (e.g., C, C++, Java, XML, Tcl), in the way communications are managed (e.g., explicit messages, agent replication), in the presence of a load balancing mechanism, in the performance of the resulting simulator, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%