The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people

Abstract: Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Home based programmes have been shown to be superior to centre-based ones in terms of adherence to exercise [53] and are attractive to many people with COPD who are unable to attend centre-based activities due to work/life commitments or due to limitations to performing exercise such as additional musculoskeletal impairments or profound breathlessness. Therefore, it is of clinical significance that participants have derived important benefits from this home based programme.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Home based programmes have been shown to be superior to centre-based ones in terms of adherence to exercise [53] and are attractive to many people with COPD who are unable to attend centre-based activities due to work/life commitments or due to limitations to performing exercise such as additional musculoskeletal impairments or profound breathlessness. Therefore, it is of clinical significance that participants have derived important benefits from this home based programme.…”
Section: Clinical Implications Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two systematic reviews 9,26 compared rehabilitation environments irrespective of diagnosis. Ward et al 26 were unable to determine the benefits or risks of the 3 different care environments they studied. Evans et al 9 more narrowly focused on inpatient specialized rehabilitation compared with conventional medical care and found that specialized rehabilitation resulted in an increased likelihood of home discharge and, in the short-term, greater functional improvement and better rates of survival.…”
Section: Summary Of Findings On Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,14,20,26 The variability may have been exacerbated by the quality of studies or by the inclusion of studies from countries with different policies for access, payment, and service delivery. Additionally challenging the systematic review process, particularly in the reviews by Beaupre 20 and Ward, 26 was the diversity of the study designs selected for inclusion, which ranged from RCTs to interrupted time series. The expanded selection criteria and the heterogeneity confounding the systematic reviews may have been unavoidable in order to collect the data that were available to address the primary research question.…”
Section: Summary Of Findings On Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4] Although trials of rehabilitation in the home environment indicate cost effectiveness for many conditions, there is lack of robust evidence toward comparability of the effect of the hospital versus alternative environments. 2,5,6 The evidence is strongest for stroke 7 followed by elective joint surgery 1,8,9 and several other conditions. 1,[8][9][10][11] Rehabilitation in the home (RITH) schemes generally aim to provide short-term, person-centred care in selected cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%