2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-009-0501-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular surgery for congenital heart disease associated with trisomy 18

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent investigation Yamagishi et al, [78] suggests that surgery should be considered in trisomy 18 infants because it may improve life expectancy, facilitate discharge from the hospital, and improve quality of life of both patient and family. The author qualifies the recommendation in stating that the risk of surgery in patients with trisomy 18 is higher than in patients without trisomy 18 or in patients with trisomy 21, and acknowledges that it is still unknown whether the cardiac surgery improves the long-term prognosis of trisomy 18 children.…”
Section: Health Supervision and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent investigation Yamagishi et al, [78] suggests that surgery should be considered in trisomy 18 infants because it may improve life expectancy, facilitate discharge from the hospital, and improve quality of life of both patient and family. The author qualifies the recommendation in stating that the risk of surgery in patients with trisomy 18 is higher than in patients without trisomy 18 or in patients with trisomy 21, and acknowledges that it is still unknown whether the cardiac surgery improves the long-term prognosis of trisomy 18 children.…”
Section: Health Supervision and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, individual evaluation considering the overall health state of the infant is needed to determine optimal treatment [78]. …”
Section: Health Supervision and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns raised included improper allocation of time and resources surgery, harm to infant during and after surgery, as well as ethical considerations including the quality of life after surgery, lack of data supporting improved prognosis, and the potential of providing false hope or unrealistic expectations for the families (Boss et al, ; Graham, ; Janvier, Farlow, & Wilfond, ; Janvier & Watkins, ). Despite these raised concerns, several studies in the last decade (Bruns & Martinez, ; Kaneko et al, ; Kobayashi, Kaneko, Yamamoto, Yoda, & Tsuchiya, ; Maeda et al, ; Yamagishi, ) have described outcomes following cardiac surgery on infants with T‐18, most frequently on VSDs, ASDs, and PDAs. Two studies (Graham, Bradley, Shirali, Hills, & Atz, ; Yamagishi, ) published survival rates of infants with T‐18 after undergoing cardiac surgery, reporting 45% 2‐year survival and 86% hospital survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these raised concerns, several studies in the last decade (Bruns & Martinez, ; Kaneko et al, ; Kobayashi, Kaneko, Yamamoto, Yoda, & Tsuchiya, ; Maeda et al, ; Yamagishi, ) have described outcomes following cardiac surgery on infants with T‐18, most frequently on VSDs, ASDs, and PDAs. Two studies (Graham, Bradley, Shirali, Hills, & Atz, ; Yamagishi, ) published survival rates of infants with T‐18 after undergoing cardiac surgery, reporting 45% 2‐year survival and 86% hospital survival. One study (Costello et al, ) compared the outcomes of those infants with T‐18 who underwent cardiac surgery versus those who had palliative care and concluded that cardiac surgery should be considered for all infants with T‐18 who have moderately complex heart defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation