Cardiovascular Scientific Production in Spain and in the European and Global Context (2003-2007)

Benavent, Rafael Aleixandre; Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo; Chorro‐Gascó, Francisco J.; Alfonso-Manterola, Fernando; González‐Alcaide, Gregorio; Salvador-Taboada, María Jesús; Bolaños-Pizarro, Máxima; Areses, Esteban López de Sá y; Valderrama‐Zurián, Juan Carlos; Barón-Esquivias, Gonzalo; Plaza-Celemín, Leandro; Teresa–Galván, Eduardo de; Macaya-Miguel, Carlos; Pulpón-Rivera, Luis Alonso; Anguita‐Sánchez, Manuel; Pérez-Villacastı́n, Julián; Escosa-Royo, Luis; Martin-Burrieza, Fernando

doi:10.1016/s1885-5857(09)73535-2

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Importantly, our study showed that European orthodontic research was not evenly distributed, since only 9 countries were responsible for around 80% of the output. This trend is not limited to orthodontics, as it was also observed by bibliometric studies in prosthodontics, 26 endodontics 27,28 or in global dental research, 21,29,30 as well as other biomedical fields such as radiology, 31 cardiology, 32 urology, 33 pathology 34 or medico‐legal sciences 35 . As in our study, when adjusting for population size, small and Northern European nations (Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland) lead compared to larger and more populated countries (United Kingdom, Germany) 21,22,29,31‐34,36 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 53%

Relationship between European postgraduate programme accreditation and national research output: The case of the Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) in orthodontics. A bibliometric study

Rafflenbeul

Dot

Séverac

et al. 2020

Eur J Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To assess in each European country the correlation between the number of Network of Erasmus‐Based European Orthodontic Postgraduate Programmes (NEBEOP) members and orthodontic research activity. Secondary objectives were to describe and quantify Europe's orthodontic research. Materials and methods Articles published between 2014 and 2018 in 4 major orthodontic journals (American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, European Journal of Orthodontics, The Angle Orthodontist, Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research) and oral presentation abstracts of five European Orthodontic Society (EOS) congresses were analysed. For each European country, the total number of orthodontic programmes and NEBEOP memberships were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed, and Spearman correlation coefficients and risk ratios were calculated. Results 2039 articles and 261 oral presentation abstracts were included. Correlation coefficients between national number of publications, oral presentations, sum of these, all adjusted for population, and number of NEBEOP members in each country were 0.64, 0.65 and 0.62, respectively. Risk ratios were all above 1 and statistically significant for number of NEBEOP memberships per country, indicating positive associations with national orthodontic research productivity. Europe accounted for 30.5% of publications and 68.6% of oral presentations at EOS congresses during this period. European orthodontic research was not evenly distributed, since 9 countries were responsible for around 80% of the output. Conclusions A positive association was found between number of NEBEOP programmes and national research activity. These results could be an additional argument to support similar pan‐European initiatives and guidelines for postgraduate education, not only in orthodontics but in all other dental specialties.

show abstract