2013
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular risk stratification in rheumatic diseases: carotid ultrasound is more sensitive than Coronary Artery Calcification Score to detect subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
87
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this discrepancy may be the fact that RA patients were enrolled in this study without clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis. Additionally, the cohort seems to be younger than groups analyzed in other studies [25,26]. A younger RA group might also be responsible for the lower mean IMT than in other reports [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for this discrepancy may be the fact that RA patients were enrolled in this study without clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis. Additionally, the cohort seems to be younger than groups analyzed in other studies [25,26]. A younger RA group might also be responsible for the lower mean IMT than in other reports [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Additionally, the cohort seems to be younger than groups analyzed in other studies [25,26]. A younger RA group might also be responsible for the lower mean IMT than in other reports [25]. Although Ahmed et al analyzed an equally young group of RA patients, severe atherosclerosis was more frequent in their cohort [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…All the obtained images were examined and read by a single, blinded, experienced sonographer-cardiologist (MS). cIMT .0.90 mm and/or carotid plaques were used as the gold-standard test for subclinical atherosclerosis and high CV risk (30,31). Patients with any of the mentioned US findings were regarded as having subclinical atherosclerosis and being true high CV-risk patients (US1).…”
Section: Significance and Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В реко-мендациях EULAR 2009 г. для определения кардиоваску-лярного риска был предложен коэффициент умножения 1,5 к расчетному общему риску ССЗ, если пациенты имели два из перечисленных критериев: продолжительность за-Международные и российские рекомендации по лечению ревматических заболеваний болевания >10 лет, позитивность по РФ или АЦЦП и нали-чие внесуставных проявлений [3]. Доказано, что примене-ние этого коэффициента не позволяет адекватно рекласси-фицировать пациентов [8,78]. Кроме того, QRESEARCH Cardiovascular Risk Algorithm (QRISK) 2 (модель прогнози-рования риска ССЗ включает РА как ФР с коэффициентом умножения 1,4 для всех пациентов) [79], как правило, пе-реоценивает риск ССЗ у пациентов с РА.…”
Section: рекомендация 4 общий хс (охс) и хс липопротеидов высокой плunclassified