2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular Risk Factor Disparities in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer Compared With the General Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intervention trials and continued observational work using large cohort and population-based data in survivors are necessary to determine the effectiveness of survivor-specific treatment. With recent work identifying racial disparities in the burden of CMRFs, independent of sociodemographic and treatment-related factors, 131 future studies must include diverse populations and capitalize on the use of available genetic and epigenetic data to optimize risk assessment and understand therapeutic response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention trials and continued observational work using large cohort and population-based data in survivors are necessary to determine the effectiveness of survivor-specific treatment. With recent work identifying racial disparities in the burden of CMRFs, independent of sociodemographic and treatment-related factors, 131 future studies must include diverse populations and capitalize on the use of available genetic and epigenetic data to optimize risk assessment and understand therapeutic response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of JACC: CardioOncology , a study reported by Noyd et al 9 addresses this gap in the literature by investigating whether disparities in CVRFs by race/ethnicity are similar among childhood cancer survivors compared with the general population. To achieve this aim, the investigators leveraged 3 specific datasets: the retrospective CCSS (Childhood Cancer Survivor Study) cohort, which served as the population of interest, in addition to the CCSS sibling cohort and data from NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), which both served as the “general population” comparator cohorts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a minimum, these findings should serve to catalyze the development and implementation of equitable survivorship-focused care programs nationally. 10 As Noyd et al 9 note, childhood cancer survivors, despite sharing similar oncological diagnoses, represent an ethnically and sociodemographically diverse group. As such, there is no one-size-fits-all model in how such services are designed and delivered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%