2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2002.03719.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular Responses During Stimulation Of Hindlimb Skeletal Muscle Nerves In Anaesthetized Rats

Abstract: 1. Cardiovascular responses during static skeletal muscle contraction in anaesthetized rats appear to be contradictory. The present study attempted to explain such variations by stimulating different peripheral nerves supplying the hindlimb skeletal muscles using anaesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. 2. Muscle contractions were evoked by a 30 s stimulation of the sciatic, tibial, peroneal nerves or the sciatic nerve with transected peroneal branch at threefold the motor threshold, 0.1 msec duration and 40 Hz freq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of the present study do not support a role for the PPN in driving the cardiovascular responses to static muscle contraction in the anesthetized rat, the possibility remains that the PPN modulates reflex cardiovascular responses to muscle contraction in nonanesthetized rats or other species, which exhibit more typical pressor responses to muscle contraction (6, 7, 13, 18, 20, 26). Along similar lines, it would be interesting to test our hypothesis in rat preparations with pressor responses to muscle contraction as reported by Ishide et al (14). Although their model contrasts with our preparation on several levels, including anesthetic regimen, higher tibial nerve stimulation intensity, and markedly lower average force generation, it could shed light on a potential role for the PPN in modulation of pressor responses to muscle contraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Although the results of the present study do not support a role for the PPN in driving the cardiovascular responses to static muscle contraction in the anesthetized rat, the possibility remains that the PPN modulates reflex cardiovascular responses to muscle contraction in nonanesthetized rats or other species, which exhibit more typical pressor responses to muscle contraction (6, 7, 13, 18, 20, 26). Along similar lines, it would be interesting to test our hypothesis in rat preparations with pressor responses to muscle contraction as reported by Ishide et al (14). Although their model contrasts with our preparation on several levels, including anesthetic regimen, higher tibial nerve stimulation intensity, and markedly lower average force generation, it could shed light on a potential role for the PPN in modulation of pressor responses to muscle contraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, this species had been little used in studies of the EPR till recently. This is because of the previous conflicting data in anaesthetized rats, in which activation of the EPR has been shown to elicit both a pressor (Ishide et al 2002) and depressor response (Smith et al 2001; Hayashi, 2003; Plowey & Waldrop, 2004) or no response at all (Vissing et al 1991). These discrepancies could be due to an unknown effect of anaesthesia in this species (Smith et al 2001; Hayashi, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From these data, increased cardiac output was expected to occur during stimulation. However, the substantial mortality (50%) observed in rats anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine in combination with the suspicion of interaction between anesthesia and the effect of ISMC on BP ( Ishide et al, 2002 ) led us to conduct the same experiments in artificially ventilated rats anesthetized with choral hydrate. As observed under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia, stimulation at 5-fold motor threshold induced a time-dependent elevation of HR without associated changes in BP ( Figure 1 ) in chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats ( n = 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In opposition to the plethora of studies on the cardiovascular (CV) effects of physical activity, the CV effects of ISMC are poorly documented. Nevertheless, tachycardia was consistently reported during induced contraction ( Crayton et al, 1979 ; Ishide et al, 2002 ). More controversial and for still hypothetical reasons ( Ishide et al, 2002 ) is the effect of ISMC on arterial BP (an augmentation, a decrease or no effect), while BP increases during physical activity as a consequence of increased cardiac output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation