Cross-neutralisation has been demonstrated for haemorrhagic venoms including Echis spp. and Cerastes spp. and for Australia elapid procoagulant toxins. A previous study showed that commercial tiger snake antivenom (TSAV) was able to neutralise the systemic effects of the Egyptian cobra, Naja haje, in vivo but it is unclear if this was true cross-neutralisation. The aim of the current study was to determine whether TSAV can neutralise the in vitro neurotoxic effects of N. haje venom. Both Notechis scutatus (10 lg/ml) and N. haje (10 lg/ml) venoms caused inhibition of indirect (supramaximal V, 0.1 Hz, 0.2 msec.) twitches of the chick biventer cervicis nerve-muscle preparation with t 90 values (i.e. the time to produce 90% inhibition of the original twitch height) of 26 ± 1 min. (n = 4) and 36 ± 4 min.; (n = 4). This effect at 10 lg/ml was significantly attenuated by the prior addition of TSAV (5 U/ml). A comparison of the reverse-phase HPLC profiles of both venoms showed some similarities with peak elution times, and SDS-PAGE analysis elucidated comparable bands across both venoms. Further analysis using Western immunoblotting indicated TSAV was able to detect N. haje venom, and enzyme immunoassay showed that in-house biotinylated polyclonal monovalent N. scutatus antibodies were able to detect N. haje venom. These findings demonstrate crossneutralisation between different and geographically separated snakes supporting potential immunological similarities in snake toxin groups for a large range of snakes. This provides more evidence that antivenoms could be developed against specific toxin groups to cover a large range of snakes.Snake envenoming is an important public health problem in tropical and subtropical countries (e.g. Africa, Asia, Oceania and Latin America). Indeed, it has been estimated that at least 440,000 envenomings and 20,000 deaths occur annually [1]. The effects of systemic envenoming by elapid snakes may include neuromuscular paralysis, myotoxicity, coagulopathy and renal toxicity [2][3][4][5]. Local effects are often seen as well, such as severe pain, swelling and necrosis.The mainstay of treatment for systemic snake envenoming is the administration of either monovalent or polyvalent antivenom. Many underdeveloped countries, in which some of the deadliest snakes inhabit, do not have the resources and/or the financial means to stock, or facilitate the development of appropriate antivenoms. This necessitates the use of antivenoms that are not targeted against the species of snakes in that country. Antivenom paraspecificity, or antivenom crossneutralisation, refers to the ability of antivenom raised against a single species (i.e. monovalent) to neutralise the activity of venom from a different and often unrelated species. This phenomenon is not uncommon [6][7][8][9][10]. Minton (1967) examined the effect of various antivenoms manufactured by CSL Ltd through a series of LD 50 studies using mice and found that they were effective in neutralising a range of both Australian and exotic elapid ...