1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00054190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular effects of the novel potassium channel opener bimakalim in conscious pigs after myocardial infarction: A comparative study with nicorandil

Abstract: The benzopyran-derivative bimakalim is an ATP-dependent potassium channel activator that has been shown to be a potent arterial vasodilator in anesthetized pigs. In the present study we evaluated the cardiovascular profile of bimakalim in normal conscious animals and conscious animals with chronic left ventricular dysfunction and compared the results to those obtained with nicorandil. In normal conscious pigs, bimakalim (37.5-300 ng/kg/min, n = 6) and nicorandil (10-80 micrograms/kg/min, n = 8) increased cardi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the discrepancy between the two studies regarding the infusion rate–coronary flow relationship was likely due to a higher plasma drug concentration in our study. In a previous study using conscious swine with myocardial infarction, 14 neither heart rate nor mean aortic pressure changed significantly over a wide range of nicorandil infusion rates (from 10 to 80 μg/kg per min, i.v.). Thus, it appears that heart rate and mean aortic pressure responses to nicorandil depend on drug concentration and anaesthesia status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the discrepancy between the two studies regarding the infusion rate–coronary flow relationship was likely due to a higher plasma drug concentration in our study. In a previous study using conscious swine with myocardial infarction, 14 neither heart rate nor mean aortic pressure changed significantly over a wide range of nicorandil infusion rates (from 10 to 80 μg/kg per min, i.v.). Thus, it appears that heart rate and mean aortic pressure responses to nicorandil depend on drug concentration and anaesthesia status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In response to the infarct, the residual myocardium undergoes dilatation and hypertrophy, with an approximate 25% increase in LV mass despite the loss of myocardium in the region of the occluded coronary artery 10 . Hearts with postinfarct remodelling have been found to have increased vulnerability to subendocardial ischaemia 10,14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Comparison of the reflex‐tachycardia in response to systemic hypotension produced by Z1046 (○, present study), the dopamine receptor agonist epinine (□, Van Woerkens et al , 1992b), the calcium channel blocker nisoldipine (•, Duncker et al , 1987), and the K + atp channel activators nicorandil (▪, Verdouw et al , 1987) and bimakalim (▴, Van Woerkens et al , 1992a) in awake resting pigs. Data are presented as absolute changes in heart rate vs absolute changes in aortic pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This hypothesis is supported by the observation that 100 μg kg −1 resulted in transient (< 5 min) increases in heart rate and cardiac output, that were absent when animals were pretreated with combined α‐ and β‐adrenoceptor blockade. It is important to note that in our awake swine model, Z1046 produced severe hypotension with considerably less reflex‐tachycardia than produced by pure vasodilators such as the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (Duncker et al , 1988) or K + ATP channel activators like nicorandil (Verdouw et al , 1987) and bimakalim (Van Woerkens et al , 1992a) that we have studied in the same model (Figure 7). The dopamine receptor agonist epinine, which also had some β 2 ‐adrenoceptor agonistic properties in this model, produces slightly greater increases in heart rate at a given reduction in mean aortic blood pressure (Van Woerkens et al , 1992b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation