2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2003.00133_8.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular effects of propofol alone and in combination with ketamine for total intravenous anesthesia in healthy cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, during the whole anesthesia procedure measurements of cardiac output as determined by CO TD, CO DP and CO DA were stable over time (Table 1). Quandt et al (1998), in dogs anesthetized with a single dose of propofol and using thermodilution, did not observe depressant effects of this drug on CO and showed stability of CO. Ilkiw & Pascoe (2003), in a study with cats anesthetized with a propofol infusion, concluded that this drug alone provided cardiopulmonary stability. Although Mason et al (2001) states that higher and lower CO influences the degree of agreement between methods, cardiac output values were stable in this study, thus the influence of the level of CO on the degree of agreement could not be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, during the whole anesthesia procedure measurements of cardiac output as determined by CO TD, CO DP and CO DA were stable over time (Table 1). Quandt et al (1998), in dogs anesthetized with a single dose of propofol and using thermodilution, did not observe depressant effects of this drug on CO and showed stability of CO. Ilkiw & Pascoe (2003), in a study with cats anesthetized with a propofol infusion, concluded that this drug alone provided cardiopulmonary stability. Although Mason et al (2001) states that higher and lower CO influences the degree of agreement between methods, cardiac output values were stable in this study, thus the influence of the level of CO on the degree of agreement could not be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%