2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2013.6611164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiovascular disease risk assessment innovative approaches developed in HeartCycle project

Abstract: Two innovative CVD event risk assessment strategies were developed in the scope of HeartCycle project: i) combination of individual risk assessment tools; ii) personalization of risk assessment based on grouping of patients. These approaches aimed to defeat some of the major limitations of the tools currently applied in the daily clinical practice, namely to: i) improve the risk prediction performance when comparing it to the one achieved by the individual current risk assessment tools; ii) consider the availa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A personalization strategy, based on groups of patients, was also derived to address the problem of lack of performance. That methodology was supported on the evidence that a specific risk assessment tool may have a good performance within a given group of patients and might perform poorly within other groups [9]. The current work further explores this personalization concept, comparing the results obtained through two different strategies: i) clustering patients approach; ii) similarity measures approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A personalization strategy, based on groups of patients, was also derived to address the problem of lack of performance. That methodology was supported on the evidence that a specific risk assessment tool may have a good performance within a given group of patients and might perform poorly within other groups [9]. The current work further explores this personalization concept, comparing the results obtained through two different strategies: i) clustering patients approach; ii) similarity measures approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, despite their clinical relevance, these tools present some important limitations [9]. Our recent research has addressed this problem through the development of different methodologies [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation