Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Assessment of HIV Medication Regimens using hematopoietic CD34+ progenitor cells

Abstract

Background To determine the effects of integrase inhibitor (INSTI) in comparison to non INSTI based regimens such as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) based regimens on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in HIV+ patients without overt history of CVD or diabetes, with normal CD4:CD8 count. For CVD risk assessment we primarily used hematopoietic CD34+ progenitor cells, as a biomarker.Methods19 male subjects ages 32-61 years with BMI 21.0- 36.0, were enrolled. This was a single time point, cross-sectional, observational study. Subjects were enrolled under 2 groups (either on INSTI based regimen with 13 subjects or NNRTI (non-INSTI) based regimens with 6 subjects) who were taking stable doses of HAART. The medication regimens were a combination of one NRTI (typically tenofovir-emtricitabine) plus one INSTI or NNRTI. Our outcome measures were focused on cardiovascular and endothelial cell function and systemic inflammation. Our primary outcome measures were peripheral blood derived hematopoietic progenitor cell number (CD34 and CD133 positive), CD34+ cell function and gene expression studies. Our secondary outcomes were arterial stiffness measures and serum-based markers of inflammation. ResultsA significant increase in percentage number of progenitor cells, CD133+ cells (P=0.004) was noted along with an increase of double progenitor mark positive CD133+/CD34+ progenitor cell population was observed in INSTI group as compared to NNRTI group, by flow-cytometry. mRNA gene expression for antioxidant gene catalase was noted along with a trend towards a decrease in gene expression of inflammatory marker IL6 (p=0.06) was observed in CD34+ from INSTI group vs NNRTI group. The plasma IL-6 and CRP levels did not change significantly between the groups. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an important marker of inflammation, was noted to be lower in INSTI group. A mean fasting glucose level was also lower in the INSTI group compared to NNRTI group (p=0.03). Interestingly, Urine- Microalbumin levels were higher in the INSTI group compared to NNRTI group (p=0.08), while eGFR levels were lower in the INSTI group (p=0.002). The arterial stiffness measures did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. ConclusionWe conclude that the INSTI regimen may provide a better CVD risk profile compared to NNRTI based HAART regimen; however the increased albuminuria along with lower eGFR, noted in INSTI group is of concern. Because of the small size, these results would need replication in additional studies before changing clinical practice.Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03782142?cond=Hiv&spons=Sabyasachi+sen&cntry=US&state=US%3ADC&city=Washington&draw=2&rank=1ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03782142