2019 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccci.2019.8822218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiotocography Analysis for Fetal State Classification Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the Decision Tree gets the best accuracy at 93.3% [16]. On the other hand, Kanika Agrawal et al tried to compare the classification results using Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes Classifier which were analyzed using R-Studio [17]. The results show that the classification model gets the highest accuracy in the Decision Tree algorithm as same as the research conducted by Subha et al in previous study [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The results show that the Decision Tree gets the best accuracy at 93.3% [16]. On the other hand, Kanika Agrawal et al tried to compare the classification results using Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes Classifier which were analyzed using R-Studio [17]. The results show that the classification model gets the highest accuracy in the Decision Tree algorithm as same as the research conducted by Subha et al in previous study [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The existing studies [10,13,14,15,19,20,21] generally used all the available features (21) of the CTG dataset to build their models. Mohammad Saber Iraji [8] implemented several neural network models, among them the DSSAEs (deep stacked sparse auto-encoders) achieved the maximum accuracy of 96.77%, yet the model applied all the 21 features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the findings of several research work suggest that the tree-based algorithms handled this situation more effectively and outperformed the other traditional algorithms by reducing the error rate in classification [7,9,10,11]. In many research, the F1-score and sensitivity rate of the Suspicious case varies mostly between 45%-82% and 39%-90% respectively, on the other hand, in Pathological cases, it varies between 64%-97% and 59-97% respectively [13,18,19,20]. Considering clinical fetal health monitoring, it may cause potential risks if those models (low F1-score and sensitivity) are applied in real-life applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sensitivity of FM varies greatly from pregnant women [12], and it is challenging to monitor FM in the long term by subjective judgment. In recent years, wearable health monitoring devices had become a hot spot of research in the biomedical field, and the use of wearable acceleration sensors and modern digital signal processing techniques to achieve automatic recognition of FM has received widespread attention from researchers from all walks of life [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. e accelerometers are small, inexpensive, noninvasive, sensitive, and stable and have become the ideal solution for noninvasive FM recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some researchers have used traditional machine learning classifiers to train and predict the extracted raw acceleration time-and frequency-domain feature signals that aim to distinguish the FM signal class of other noisy signal classes [17,[21][22][23][24]. Vullings and Mischi [17] proposed a method of noninvasive monitoring of FM by using TF characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%